All posts by joel

February Producer Prices and Small Business Confidence

KEY DATA: PPI: +0.3%; Excluding Food and Energy: +0.3%/ NFIB: -0.6 point

IN A NUTSHELL: “The rise in price pressures continues and it is very likely the Fed will make a move tomorrow.”

WHAT IT MEANS: The Fed’s rate setting committee, the FOMC, is in day one of its two-day meeting and while you can never be certain what the members will do, it looks like a rate hike is coming when the statement is released tomorrow afternoon. Today’s data only reinforce that view. First, wholesale prices rose moderately in February, led by another jump in energy costs. Over the year, producer prices are have now risen by over 2% and are up by nearly that pace even excluding the volatile food and energy components, as the gains were spread across most areas. Food and services expenses posted solid increases, adding to the cost pressures. Looking down the road, sharp rises in intermediate goods costs are pointing to further increases in consumer finished goods prices and that doesn’t bode well for inflation.

Small business owners have been ecstatic about the election and their confidence has soared. But that could change. The National Federation of Independent Business’ small business index fell slightly in February. Though the index remains at a high level, the NFIB president issued this warning: “The sustainability of this surge and whether it will lead to actual economic growth depends on Washington’s ability to deliver on the agenda that small business voted for in November. If the health care and tax policy discussions continue without action, optimism will fade.” Given the chaos over the AHCA, which should be called Republicancare, and the lack of any proposal on tax reform, don’t be surprised if small business owners become a little more cautious about the future.

MARKETS AND FED POLICY IMPLICATIONS: With a rate hike potentially only 24 hours away, it is time to start recognizing that rates are really going up this year and probably faster and greater than thought. Fed Chair Yellen will have a press conference tomorrow after the meeting and might provide a small amount of guidance as to future actions. In addition, there will even be another round of the infamous and largely useless dot plots that provide “insights” into the members’ thinking. I suspect there will be a shift to as many as four increases. Coming into the year, I had forecasted three increases but a total of one percentage point. It looks like that 100 basis point forecast may occur, but through a quarter point increase every other meeting. Regardless, the markets didn’t have a full point hike factored in coming into the year and many still have the “when I see it, I will believe it” attitude when it comes to Fed actions. That is actually a rational approach given the hesitancy to raise rates we have seen from this Fed Chair. But my view is that once she gets going, and assuming the Republicans actually pass a tax and spending plan, Chair Yellen will push ahead steadily.

February Private Sector Jobs and Help Wanted OnLine

KEY DATA: ADP: +298,000; Construction: 66,000/ HWOL: -360,2000

IN A NUTSHELL: “If job gains are really heating up this much, the Fed might find itself behind the curve and having to catch up.”

WHAT IT MEANS: A strong employment number on Friday could cement a Fed rate hike next Wednesday and it looks like that could happen. ADP’s estimate of February private sector job gains was off the charts, or at least well above anyone’s expectations. The rise was led by a surge in construction jobs that was the second largest since the report was first released fifteen years ago. The only time there was a greater increase was at the peak of the home construction boom and we know that is not happening right now. The incredibly warm February weather across much of the nation may have played a major role in this outsized estimate. There was also a huge rise in manufacturing payrolls. That doesn’t seem to be weather driven, but the gain was the third highest in this measure’s history. Why the sudden surge in hiring, especially given the shortage of workers, is unclear.   It raises questions about whether this is the start of a greater hiring trend or just a seasonal adjustment anomaly. Regardless, it is really nice to see.

Another reason that I am cautious about the ADP report was the large decline in the number of online ads, as reported by the Conference Board. The level was the lowest in almost five years and every major state reported a drop. There are a number of divergent reasons for the nearly steady decline that has been going on for fifteen months. First, labor demand may simply be slowing, as the economy hasn’t grown particularly robustly. The second is that firms are recognizing that in this labor shortage environment, they cannot fill a lot of the openings so they are cutting back on their advertising. Actually, a combination of the two could be occurring. That would argue for slow job gains. Alternatively, firms may actually be finding workers all those workers they are saying they cannot find and filling the openings. That would argue for strong job increases. We may not know for a few months which explanation reflects reality.

The Labor Department released revised productivity data for the final quarter of 2016 and it was depressing. Productivity increased in 2016 by the slowest pace since 2011. It is hard to grow rapidly, especially with businesses having so much trouble finding “qualified” workers, if firms cannot get a lot more out of current workers. Indeed, if we do get a surge in payrolls this quarter, as the other data imply, productivity will likely start of the year on a down note.

MARKETS AND FED POLICY IMPLICATIONS: Friday we will get the February payroll and unemployment government data and they should be good. Every once in a while, ADP and the Labor Department differ significantly in their estimates of private job gains, so it is unclear how big a number we will get. But if the employment increase exceeds 200,000 and wages rise solidly, as expected, a Fed rate hike should be assumed. I never say “done deal” when it comes to the Fed, but a strong report would get us pretty close to one. And it would reinforce the warning that I have been making that rates could rise faster and go higher than the markets currently anticipate.

I am headed out on my annual father/son Phillies spring training trip, so I will not be around for what may be a fun morning on Friday. Buckle up, everyone. The only roller coaster I will be riding will be in Islands of Adventure.

January Trade Deficit and Housing Prices

KEY DATA: Deficit: $4.2 billion wider; Imports: +2.3%; Exports: +0.6%/ Home Prices (Over-Year): +6.9%

IN A NUTSHELL: “The strengthening economy is sucking in foreign products and that could depress first quarter growth.”

WHAT IT MEANS: The stock markets may be hitting new record highs and consumer confidence soaring, but don’t look for a huge increase in economic growth. Yes, first quarter growth should be better than the tepid pace posted at the end of last year, but if the trade deficit keeps widening, it will not be anything great. Indeed, the January deficit was the largest in almost five years, led by a surge in demand for foreign products. We bought a lot more oil, cell phones, vehicles and capital goods. On the export side, farmers did well as did the vehicle sector, and we did sell a lot of energy to the rest of the world. But a slowdown in aircraft related shipments depressed the export total. That could change quickly, so don’t assume the deficit will keep rising.

It’s always nice when economic theory actually works and that is the case with the housing sector. The limited supply of homes on the market is driving up prices sharply. CoreLogic’s Home Price Index jumped in January and over-the-year. Improving wage gains, confidence and credit scores are allowing more families to enter the market and they are bidding high for the limited inventory. We are in another leg up of price gains. With the Fed likely embarking on what could turn out to be a fairly consistent pattern of rate hikes, we could see prices rise even faster if buyers try to beat the rising mortgage rates. Of the ten major metro areas CoreLogic charts, four were rated as “overvalued”. The rest were considered to be fairly valued.

Two other reports were released today. The Paychex/IHS Small Business Jobs Index rose for the third consecutive month and the gains were across the nation and across almost every sector. The IBD/TIPP Economic Optimism index fell for the first time since the election and the expectations index posted its second consecutive decline. Still, both indices remain well above where they were before the election.

MARKETS AND FED POLICY IMPLICATIONS: Employment Friday is this week, so most data will take a back seat to that report. I don’t expect the jobs gain number to be great, but good enough that the FOMC members will have little reason to faint at the prospect of raising rates. Regardless of the number of positions added or the unemployment rate, a sharp rise in wages would do the job and that is a distinct possibility. The economy is not booming, but that may actually be working to the Fed’s advantage. Fed Chair Yellen has said the members estimate that we are at an unemployment rate consistent with full employment. A strongly growing economy would tax the tight labor market, making it difficult for firms to continue expanding rapidly without bidding up wages to attract the workers they need. Inflation would rise and that could lead to the Fed to increasing rates more often than expected. A rate hike at next week’s FOMC meeting is likely, especially since the markets expect one. But that opens up the possibility of an increase each quarter. And a major fiscal stimulus package would only add to the belief that people are underestimating how much rates could rise this year.  

February Non-Manufacturing Activity

KEY DATA: ISM (Non-Manufacturing): +1.1 points; Activity: +3.3 points; Orders: +2.6 points

IN A NUTSHELL: “With all components of the economy on the rise, the question for the Fed is this: What are you waiting for?”

WHAT IT MEANS: We’re hitting on just about all cylinders. Wednesday, the Institute for Supply Management reported that manufacturing activity accelerated in February and today it was announced that the rest of the economy picked up steam as well. Business activity improved, led by rising demand for not only for domestic firms but for those involved in both importing and exporting. The improving world economic situation is helping drive additional sales to other countries. It’s funny how economics works that way. Employment growth was a little faster and is likely to increase more as backlogs are building. About the only negative in the report was a large increase in the percentage that think inventories are too high. Stocks are building and demand will have to remain strong or firms will look to ease up on additional production.

Yesterday, a report was released that should have really opened eyes at the Fed. The weekly unemployment claims number came in at 223,000, the lowest since April 1973. Let me put that in perspective. The labor force back then was 89 million compared to about 160 million today. Adjusting for the size of the labor force, the number of claims would have to currently be 400,000 in order for the two to be comparable. Simply put, this labor market is really tight.

MARKETS AND FED POLICY IMPLICATIONS: Due to calendar oddities and when the labor market data are collected, the employment report was delayed a week. That is actually too bad. There will only be four days between when we get the numbers and when the FOMC starts its two-day meeting. The Fed will not be able to react to the report. It is clear the economy is moving forward and may be picking up steam. Consumer confidence is very high, spending is decent, just about all sectors, including energy, are growing and the Fed’s dual mandate has essentially being met. There is every reason for the FOMC to announce its first rate hike of the year on March 15th. But what happens if the jobs report is weak? The January job gains were outsized and these data can be pretty volatile, especially in winter months. The Fed should look past one report and probably will, but this has been a group of decision makers who panicked at any sign of economic trouble in the past. That said, the messages being sent by Fed members have all been similar: A rate hike is coming and a half-decent employment report, which is the consensus right now, should be enough. Going into this year, few were predicting a March increase. I had the following meeting, in May. But the general belief was that it wouldn’t happen until June. A March increase creates the possibility that we could have more than the Fed’s implied three rate hikes, especially if the Republicans stop acting like disorganized Democrats and start actually passing something that has to do with the economy – or at least proposing something. As I keep saying, highly stimulative fiscal policy, especially in a labor shortage economy, is likely to cause the Fed to be more aggressive than most people think. Investors seem totally clueless or unconcerned by that possibility.  

January Income and Spending and February Manufacturing Activity

KEY DATA: Consumption: +0.2%; Income: +0.3%; Prices: +0.4%/ ISM (Manufacturing): +1.7 points; Orders: +4.7 points

IN A NUTSHELL: “It’s nice that manufacturing is accelerating, but it is worrisome that rising prices are wiping out household income gains.”

WHAT IT MEANS: If the consumer is going to lead the way, and household spending kept the economy afloat last year, then incomes better start growing faster because inflation is on the rise. Consumer spending was solid in January as households bought lots of soft-goods but not a lot of durables or services. Indeed, the only category reporting an increase was nondurables and that was due to increasing prices. Actually, the big story in this report was not the jump in spending but the sharp rise in consumer costs. The acceleration in inflation totally wiped out the rise in consumption and that raises questions about the ability of households to keep holding up the economy. Yes, incomes did increase nicely but spending power declined. We need wages and salaries, which rose moderately, to show bigger gains going forward. For the Fed, its preferred measure of inflation is now just a small tick away from its target. The Personal Consumption Expenditure deflator was up 1.9% over the year.

Manufacturers are going to watch the situation with the consumer carefully. The sector has been recovery very nicely and the Institute for Supply Management’s reported that activity accelerated again in February. This was the sixth consecutive month the headline index rose. Demand was strong, production increased and orders swelled. Hiring is still solid but not quite as strong as it had been.

Separately, the U.S. Census Department reported that construction activity fell in January as a large drop in public sector overcame a moderate rise in the private sector.

MARKETS AND FED POLICY IMPLICATIONS: The Fed is meeting in two weeks and we now have everything in position for a rate hike. The Beige Book summary of economic activity indicated that the labor shortages are getting worse and causing wages in some areas to rise faster. The members will be discussing that when they start the meeting on March 14th. Adding to the Fed’s concerns is that inflation is now at its target on likely to go through it in the next month or two. So, its two mandates, full employment and stable (i.e., target) inflation are being met. While last night’s presidential address didn’t provide any usable details about policy, it is clear the President is intent on pushing his agenda of tax cuts and spending increases. To whatever extent that happens, growth should accelerate by year’s end. So, the Fed has no reason to stand pat. Yes, rising prices are curtailing consumer spending power, but the labor market tightness offset some of that. More importantly, the Fed knows it has a long way to go before it hits a neutral or long-term rate and it needs to get going on that process before inflation becomes an issue. Will we get a rate hike in two weeks? The members are trying to get the word out that it is now a real possibility. I had been expecting the move at the following meeting in May, but now I think it is a toss up. Regardless, rates are going up and if the expansionary fiscal policy does get passed, look for them to rise faster than the market currently expects. I a sticking with my 100 basis points – one percentage point – increase this year.

January New Home Sales and February Consumer Confidence

KEY DATA: Sales: +3.7%; Over-Year: +5.5%; Prices: +7.5% / Confidence: -2.2 points

IN A NUTSHELL: “Consumers are confident and are buying homes, but builders are not getting their share of that demand.”

WHAT IT MEANS: The economy is solid, consumer confidence is high and growth in the United States and around the world is improving. That is a mess every new president should hope for. Today’s data only add to the belief that while conditions are not booming along, they are accelerating. New home sales rose moderately in January. Still, the level of demand remains less than most builders would like to see. Whereas existing home sales were the highest in a decade, newly built units are still selling at depressed rates. Indeed, sales need to increase between 15% and 20% for the market to be called solid. Looking across the nation, solid gains were seen in all areas except the West. As for prices, they are rose rapidly, though the gains have had their ups and downs. Inventory is also improving, though it is hardly what one would call excessive. There is not a whole lot of speculative building going on.

Consumer confidence has skyrocketed since the election so it was not a great surprise that the University of Michigan’s Consumer Sentiment index eased in February. Household views on current conditions improved but they were more cautious about the future. That also should shock no one. Not surprisingly, Republicans are borderline irrationally euphoric about the future while Democrats are borderline irrationally depressed. That makes clear how the political divide is affecting people’s views on the future economy and possibly spending patterns.

MARKETS AND FED POLICY IMPLICATIONS: The more data we get, the more it is clear that the economy is moving forward solidly. No, we are not going to get 3% growth on an extended basis soon, but we should move back to the 2.25% to 2.50% range that we had seen until the collapse of energy prices shut down the energy sector. It is interesting, though, to see the divide between the new home and existing home sectors. In both places, inventory is low and prices are rising, but the sales pace of newly constructed properties is disappointing. Apparently, the real deals are in existing homes and people are moving in that direction. For construction to rise faster, we need demand to increase, but builders will not put the shovel into the ground unless they have a clear indication the product will move. That is not an easy cycle to break, but it will keep us from revisiting the housing bubble days. We could use a few more homes on the market to spur traffic and ultimately sales. On the consumer front, reality needs to set in. The future is neither a rosy as Republicans think or dark as Democrats believe. But the longer it takes for the replacement of the ACA and for tax cuts and spending increases to be passed, the more concerned households, especially Republicans, will become about the future. This shows how politics could affect economic activity in this highly divided nation. When or if the uncertainty over fiscal policy takes hold in the equity markets is a wholly different question, but for now, optimism reigns.

January Housing Starts and Permits, February Philadelphia Fed Survey and Weekly Jobless Claims

KEY DATA: Starts: -2.6%; Permits: +4.6%/ Phila. Fed (Manufacturing): +19.7 points; Orders: +12 points/ Claims: +5,000

IN A NUTSHELL: “There is not much to complain about the economy as housing and manufacturing are improving and the labor market remains tight.”

WHAT IT MEANS: We know that inflation is on the rise and while energy is a factor in the acceleration of price gains, it is not the only one. The economy is getting stronger and that has major implications for future inflationary pressures. In January, housing starts edged downward, but that came after an upward revision to the December numbers. Single-family construction rose but the volatile multi-family sector fell sharply. More importantly, the level of construction was 10.5% above the January 2016 pace and 6% above the 2016 average. In other words, builders started off the year in good shape. Permit requests jumped, moving back above starts. That points to greater home construction in the months ahead. Regional activity varied widely. Construction soared in the Northeast and South but cratered in the West and Midwest. Weather matters. The number of home under construction continues to rise, though it would be nice if it increased faster. Inventory remains too low.

The Philadelphia Federal Reserve Bank’s survey of manufacturers rose sharply in February. General business activity soared, helped along by a surge in demand. Only 6% of the respondents said new orders fell, indicating that the improving economy is lifting most boats. Hiring was a little slower than it had been. Firms seem to meeting the new demand by working their current employees longer. That makes sense given the labor shortage. This month’s special question had one result that should open Janet Yellen’s eyes. Manufacturers expect inflation to run at a 3% pace over the next ten years compared to a 2.7% average in the fourth quarter 2016 survey. The FOMC keeps noting that “most survey-based measures of longer-term inflation expectations are little changed”. If inflation expectations are rising, the Fed will have to act sooner rather than later.

Unemployment claims rose last week but remain near historic lows. There just aren’t a lot of people who have skills, are between 21 and 55 and can pass a drug and background check who are sitting at home watching The Price is Right. As a result, firms holding onto their employees tightly. I expect they will start moving part-timers into full-time positions, even if that raises costs. It is better than going without and could reduce turnover and improve productivity.

MARKETS AND FED POLICY IMPLICATIONS: While the economy is in good shape, the administration is not. The chaos is raising questions about the ability to push through significant tax cuts and spending increases. Unless revenue increases are found, the proposals will cause the deficit to soar. The political pressure a $1 trillion deficit forecast would put on the Republicans would be hard enough to deal with without political problems. With those issues, action could be either pushed into later this year or only showpieces would be passed. That would not be good news to all those investors who believe that happy days are here again. As for the Fed, the unmooring of inflation expectations that we saw in the Philadelphia Fed survey is a clear warning that the days of doing nothing are over. A large increase in both jobs and wages in the February employment report could put the March FOMC meeting into play. At the minimum, it would support my view that the next hike could come in May. Hey bond market people, are you looking at the inflation numbers?

January Consumer Prices, Retail Sales and Industrial Production

KEY DATA: CPI: +0.6%; Excluding Energy: +0.3%/ Retail Sales: +0.4%; Excluding Vehicles: +0.8%/ IP: -0.3%; Manufacturing: +0.2%

IN A NUTSHELL: “Another inflation number, another reason to for the Fed to hike rates.”

WHAT IT MEANS: Yesterday I noted that any number that shows that inflation is rising is a warning that the Fed is going to raise rates soon. Well, the sharp rise in the Consumer Price Index in January is one of those numbers. Yes, energy costs did surge, but in her testimony, Chair Yellen said that inflation including food and energy matters. Over the year, top line inflation was 2.5% and even excluding food and energy, the so-called core, it was above the Fed’s 2% target. The gains in January were across the board with only a decline in used-vehicle prices keeping the index from rising even faster. Food at home was flat but if you went out to eat, you paid a lot more. Thankfully, fresh donut prices were down.

Rising prices is not keeping consumers from spending. Despite a slowdown in vehicle demand, retail sales rose solidly in January. People hit almost every type of store as sales of clothing, appliances and electronics, building supplies, sporting goods, food and health care products rose solidly. We didn’t buy a whole lot of furniture and interestingly, online sales were flat. That may have been due to the fact that we were eating out like crazy.

Industrial production eased in January, but as usual, the headline number didn’t tell the whole story. We had one of the warmest January’s on record, at least where I live, and utility production tanked as a consequence. But manufacturing output increased moderately and the petroleum sector continues to rebound, with output up significantly. The vehicle sector continued its wild up and down swings as assembly rates tanked after having increased in December. With new models coming out randomly, I suspect it has become hard to seasonally adjust these data.

So far, February hasn’t been a particularly good month for builders. The National Association for Home Builders index slid as traffic declined. That led to a pullback in expectations.

MARKETS AND FED POLICY IMPLICATIONS: The data are becoming clear as to both growth and inflation. Consumers are spending money at a very solid pace and that is putting a floor under growth. But inflation is accelerating. The Consumer Price Index has moved above the Fed’s target, as have a variety of other special measures that a number of Federal Reserve Banks have created. But the Board considers the Personal Consumption Expenditure price index the gold standard and we will not get that until we get the income and consumption numbers on March 1st. I expect that measure to also show inflation over the year rising by 2% or more. So, does that bring the March FOMC meeting into play for a rate hike? I think that is too soon, especially since Chair Yellen commented that fiscal policy will play a role in the Fed’s decisions. We are months away from any clear indication what those tax cuts may look like. I think the May meeting holds out great possibilities and if not then, I would be surprised if they don’t do something in June. So, we are looking at a move in the next three to five months. If that is the case and a decent sized fiscal stimulus package is passed, I expect the Fed to hike again in September and at least one other time before the end of the year. A December half-point increase would not be out of the question if the economy picks up steam and inflation continues to accelerate. I don’t believe equity investors have priced that in and the bond market seems to be just starting the process – but not with a lot of conviction.

January Wholesale Prices, Small Business Optimism and Fed Chair Yellen’s Comments

KEY DATA: PPI: +0.6%; Goods: +1%; Services: +0.3%; Ex-Food and Energy: +0.2%/ NFIB: +0.1 point

IN A NUTSHELL: “With top line inflation driving the Fed’s decision, any increase in costs moves the FOMC closer to its next rate hike.”

WHAT IT MEANS: The Fed intends to raise rates this year and more than likely several times. That much was made clear by Chair Yellen, who commented thatWaiting too long to remove accommodation would be unwise, potentially requiring the FOMC to eventually raise rates rapidly, which could risk disrupting financial markets and pushing the economy into recession“. She also noted that the Fed looks at top line inflation, which they are confident is moving toward its 2% target and that the unemployment rate is already at the level members believe is full employment. In other words, the Fed is ready to go and the only thing stopping it is below-target inflation. That is why the sharp rise in the January Producer Price Index is important. Much of the increase came from another jump in energy costs, but it wasn’t limited to petroleum. Services prices bounced back and the only thing keeping the index from rising faster were flat food costs. There is also some pressure building in the pipeline.

The National Federation of Independent Businesses reported that small business confidence edged up in January, solidifying the gains made since the election. Firms have a large number of job openings and hopefully they will be able to fill them. Owners seem willing to invest, even though the index eased a touch in January, it remains at a high level.

MARKETS AND FED POLICY IMPLICATIONS: There are great expectations that the president and Congress will come through with tax cuts and regulatory changes that will “unleash the beast” in the corporate sector. But that has to happen and lines are being drawn in the sand – and not just by Democrats. A Republican member of the House Ways and Means Committee said that there would be no tax reform without a border adjustment tax, which subsidizes exports and penalizes those that import. He is basically arguing it is time to move to a consumption tax structure. That would create a large number of winners and losers and consumers could see higher prices. Indeed, a border tax, previously known as a tariff, might be necessary as well to offset the revenue losses of tax reform. So, let the battles begin and one of the groups who may be involved is the Fed. Higher consumer costs and aggressive fiscal policy will be the green light to move rates back up to more normal levels. And the Chair noted that currently, the estimate of a “normal” rate is low because of a number of factors. If those conditions change with stronger growth, the Fed would be chasing an upward moving target. Change isn’t simple and if it is going to happen, the many moving parts have to be considered. But too many in Congress don’t have a clue that there are consequences to making the changes they are proposing. The next year should be lots of fun, with tax reform, regulatory changes, Dodd-Frank, Obamacare and rate hikes all entering into the mix. For an economist, this could be the best of times.

January Import and Export Prices and February Consumer Confidence

KEY DATA: Imports: +0.4%; Nonfuel: -0.2%; Exports: +0.1%; Farm: -0.1%/ Confidence: -2.8 points

IN A NUTSHELL: “The strong dollar is keeping everything but energy costs under control.”

WHAT IT MEANS: Import prices jumped again in January, propelled by energy. Energy prices surged by nearly 6%, after having jumped by even more in December. Over the year, the cost of imported fuel is up a whopping 58%. In January 2016, fuel costs were down nearly 40% from the previous year. So it is no wonder that overall import prices are up nearly 4% from the previous year. In just one year, the headline number has gone from a yearly change of -6.5% to a rise of 3.7%, a greater than ten percentage points swing. As for the details, imported food prices dropped sharply, though my Mexican avocados seemed to cost more. Has a border tax been implemented already? Consumer and capital goods prices eased a touch, while automotive import prices dropped sharply. In other words, there aren’t any broad-based inflationary pressures coming from the import sector. As for exports, the two-month rise in farm product prices was halted in January, but the drop was modest. Consumer export prices fell sharply and capital goods exports costs were off modestly, but vehicle makers did see a sharp rise in their prices.

The surge in consumer confidence since the election faded a touch in early February. The University of Michigan’s Consumer Sentiment Index dropped, led by a solid decline in expectations. Still, the level remains quite high. Both positive and negative reactions to the Trump actions are major factors in respondents’ attitudes and they are split pretty much down the middle between positive and negative. As I have said many times, changes in confidence driven by political factors rarely have sustained impacts on spending, so let’s wait a while before we make any judgment on how the rise – or any subsequent fall if it happens – will play out in the marketplace.

MARKETS AND FED POLICY IMPLICATIONS: Import costs, which had restrained inflation, are now rising. Should the Fed be worried about this? Yes and no. The increases are not widespread, so we cannot assume that we will be seeing consumer inflation surge. But the Fed shifted to headline inflation from core and energy is driving up that rate. Don’t be surprised if inflation tops the Fed’s 2% target in the new few months. That would mean the Fed has met both its inflation and unemployment targets, so there would be little to stop it from raising rates – if it wants to and follows its own guidelines. Still, even if inflation tops 2% before the March 14-15 FOMC meeting, the Committee is not likely to raise rates then. They will want to see what the tax cut plan, which is supposed to be “phenomenal”, looks like. (Someone should take the thesaurus away from the White House.) I have the next increase in April, which is a non-press conference meeting. I think Chair Yellen wants to prove that all meetings are live and raising rates then, especially if it comes after a major tax cut proposal, would be the easiest time to make that point.