{"id":441,"date":"2015-04-16T11:06:09","date_gmt":"2015-04-16T15:06:09","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/naroffeconomics.com\/?p=441"},"modified":"2015-04-16T11:06:09","modified_gmt":"2015-04-16T15:06:09","slug":"march-housing-starts-april-manufacturing-surveys-and-weekly-jobless-claims","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/naroffeconomics.com\/?p=441","title":{"rendered":"March Housing Starts, April Manufacturing Surveys and Weekly Jobless Claims"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong style=\"text-decoration: underline;\"><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">KEY DATA:<\/span><\/strong> Starts: +2%; 1-Family: +4.4%; Permits: -5.7%; 1-Family: +2.1%\/ Phila. Fed: +2.5 points; Employees: +8 points\/ MAPI: -2 points\/ Jobless Claims: up 12,000<\/p>\n<p><strong><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">IN A NUTSHELL:<\/span><\/strong> <strong><em> \u00e2\u20ac\u0153While builders are still slow in getting more shovels in the ground, the signs point to a lot more activity in the next few months.\u00e2\u20ac\u009d<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">WHAT IT MEANS:<\/span><\/strong> While builders are becoming more positive about conditions, they are not doing that much about it. <strong><em>Housing starts rose in March, but the rise did not unwind the large February decline. <\/em><\/strong> First quarter activity was nearly 9% below the fourth quarter 2014 average. That is hardly a surprise given the winter weather. The data were all over the place. Better weather led to a more than doubling of construction in the Northeast and a 31% surge in the Midwest. In contrast, starts fell by nearly 20% in the West and by over 3% in the South. No pattern there. <strong><em>What caused only a limited rise in construction activity was a major downturn in multi-family activity, especially in the West. <\/em><\/strong> <strong><em>That is likely the result of normal volatility in the data, implying we really shouldn\u00e2\u20ac\u2122t be too worried that starts didn\u00e2\u20ac\u2122t rebound more in March.<\/em><\/strong> Indeed, there is every reason to believe that the April report will be quite strong. First, <strong><em>single-family construction is not faltering.<\/em><\/strong> Second, and more fundamentally, <strong><em>there were roughly 300,000 more permits taken out during the first quarter than there were starts \u00e2\u20ac\u201c and almost all of them were for multi-family dwellings<\/em><\/strong>. As I always note,<strong><em> builders are not paying for permits for the fun of it. Those permits are going to be used in the spring.<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The manufacturing sector took a big hit this winter as both weather and a strong dollar slowed the sector down. The latest data don\u00e2\u20ac\u2122t indicate any major improvement. <strong><em>The Philadelphia Fed\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s manufacturing survey rose modestly in early April. Firms are hiring a lot more people<\/em><\/strong> but how long that will last is uncertain as <strong><em>new orders are growing more slowly<\/em><\/strong>. Expectations rose, but minimally. <strong><em>A second survey, one done quarterly by the Manufacturers Alliance for Productivity and Innovation (MAPI), indicated that activity also eased modestly in the first quarter. <\/em><\/strong> Despite a rise in current orders, capacity utilization and investment, most other indicators declined. My take away is that conditions moderated but didn\u00e2\u20ac\u2122t fall greatly.<\/p>\n<p><strong><em>Jobless claims rose a touch, but they remain at levels consistent with solid to strong job gains.<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">MARKETS AND FED POLICY IMPLICATIONS:<\/span><\/strong> <strong><em>The headline housing numbers didn\u00e2\u20ac\u2122t tell the full story. While construction failed to rebound sharply in March, I would be shocked if the April numbers were not robust.<\/em><\/strong> <strong><em>Sharp declines in multi-family starts often are followed by large increases, and the gap between permits and starts in that segment points to that happening. <\/em><\/strong> The strong dollar is taking a toll on manufacturing and that is likely to be an issue for a while. But the sector is holding in, even if it is not leading the way. All in all, <strong><em>the first quarter was a disappointment but there is reason to expect conditions to improve as we go forward. But we need data to show that is happening before the Fed does anything. <\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>KEY DATA: Starts: +2%; 1-Family: +4.4%; Permits: -5.7%; 1-Family: +2.1%\/ Phila. Fed: +2.5 points; Employees: +8 points\/ MAPI: -2 points\/ Jobless Claims: up 12,000 IN A NUTSHELL: \u00e2\u20ac\u0153While builders are still slow in getting more shovels in the ground, the signs point to a lot more activity in the next few months.\u00e2\u20ac\u009d WHAT IT MEANS: &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/naroffeconomics.com\/?p=441\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">March Housing Starts, April Manufacturing Surveys and Weekly Jobless Claims<\/span> <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-441","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/naroffeconomics.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/441","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/naroffeconomics.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/naroffeconomics.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/naroffeconomics.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/naroffeconomics.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=441"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/naroffeconomics.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/441\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":442,"href":"https:\/\/naroffeconomics.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/441\/revisions\/442"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/naroffeconomics.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=441"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/naroffeconomics.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=441"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/naroffeconomics.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=441"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}