{"id":1930,"date":"2021-02-01T12:26:12","date_gmt":"2021-02-01T17:26:12","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/naroffeconomics.com\/?p=1930"},"modified":"2021-02-01T12:26:12","modified_gmt":"2021-02-01T17:26:12","slug":"january-manufacturing-activity-and-december-construction-spending","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/naroffeconomics.com\/?p=1930","title":{"rendered":"January Manufacturing Activity and December Construction Spending"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong><u>KEY DATA:<\/u><\/strong> &nbsp;ISM (Manufacturing): -1.8 points; Orders: -6.4 points; Employment: +0.9 point\/ Construction: +1%; Private: +1.2%; Residential: +3.1%; Nonresidential: -1.7%<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong><u>IN A NUTSHELL:<\/u><\/strong> <strong><em>\u201cThe unevenness in the economic expansion can be seen in the continued strength in manufacturing, while business construction keeps fading.\u201d<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong><u>WHAT IT MEANS:<\/u><\/strong>&nbsp; <strong><em>The economy is in good shape, but that does not mean every component is doing well.&nbsp; On the positive side, there\u2019s manufacturing.<\/em><\/strong>&nbsp; <strong><em>The Institute for Supply Management\u2019s index of the manufacturing activity fell in January.<\/em><\/strong>&nbsp; So, is this segment of the economy starting to fade?&nbsp; Hardly.&nbsp; <strong><em>The index level remains high.<\/em><\/strong>&nbsp; The report noted that \u201c<em>Of the six biggest manufacturing industries, five \u2026 registered moderate to strong growth in January.\u201d<\/em>&nbsp; <strong><em>Orders grew strongly, though not as robustly had they had been.&nbsp; Nonetheless, backlogs built even faster and hiring picked up.&nbsp; I<\/em><\/strong>n other words, the sector kept expanding solidly, but maybe the robust growth should now be categorized as strong.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong><em>The construction sector has been the star of the economy, but that is due to the housing market.<\/em><\/strong>&nbsp; <strong><em>While private residential activity soared in December, nonresidential construction spending continued the slowdown that we have seen since November 2019.<\/em><\/strong>&nbsp; Not surprisingly, lodging led the decline, but it was not the only category to report either declines over the month or over the year.&nbsp; Seven of the eleven components saw construction spending fall in December and all eleven were down when compared to the December 2019 pace. &nbsp;Meanwhile, private residential activity was up almost twenty-one percent over the year.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong><u>IMPLICATIONS:<\/u><\/strong> &nbsp;<strong><em>If it\u2019s all about the virus, actually the vaccines, then there is good news for the economy.&nbsp; Two more vaccines may become available in the relative near future and that should help reduce greatly the bottleneck caused by a lack of supply and an inefficient distribution system<\/em><\/strong>.&nbsp; I keep hearing that there is a lack of health care professionals qualified to give the shots, but that is hard to believe.&nbsp; In the county I live in, none of the pharmacies listed as giving the shots are in chain pharmacies such as CVS, Walgreens or Rite Aid.&nbsp; There are plenty of pharmacists trained to give shots at the chain stores as all of them offer most other common vaccinations.&nbsp; <strong><em>The problem, it seems to me, is that the supply is so limited that it cannot be efficiently distributed to a larger number of locations.<\/em><\/strong>&nbsp; Thus, <strong><em>once the supply increases, the rate of distribution should accelerate sharply.&nbsp; <\/em><\/strong>The major question then becomes: How many people will not get vaccinated even when the supply is readily available?&nbsp; And if that number is significant, what does it mean for the safety of the population? That ultimately makes a difference as to how fast the economy can return to what will be the next normal.&nbsp; <strong><em>We are moving forward, but it will still take time to get through this, so some additional government support will be necessary. <\/em><\/strong>&nbsp;<strong><em>How much we will need is unclear, but as this is likely a situation where if you have to make a mistake, you probably want to overdo it, not do too little.<\/em><\/strong>&nbsp; Large numbers of zombie companies would fail and too many families would continue going without if the government winds up not doing enough.&nbsp; But politics and economics operate in parallel universes, so who knows what kind of stimulus bill will be passed. &nbsp;<strong><em>There is likely to be a fairly aggressive spending bill pushed through by the Democrats, and when you add in an aggressive Fed, the probability growth will falter significantly this year is low.&nbsp; &nbsp;<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>KEY DATA: &nbsp;ISM (Manufacturing): -1.8 points; Orders: -6.4 points; Employment: +0.9 point\/ Construction: +1%; Private: +1.2%; Residential: +3.1%; Nonresidential: -1.7% IN A NUTSHELL: \u201cThe unevenness in the economic expansion can be seen in the continued strength in manufacturing, while business construction keeps fading.\u201d WHAT IT MEANS:&nbsp; The economy is in good shape, but that does &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/naroffeconomics.com\/?p=1930\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">January Manufacturing Activity and December Construction Spending<\/span> <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1930","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/naroffeconomics.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1930","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/naroffeconomics.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/naroffeconomics.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/naroffeconomics.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/naroffeconomics.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=1930"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/naroffeconomics.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1930\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1931,"href":"https:\/\/naroffeconomics.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1930\/revisions\/1931"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/naroffeconomics.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=1930"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/naroffeconomics.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=1930"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/naroffeconomics.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=1930"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}