{"id":1777,"date":"2020-07-01T12:45:37","date_gmt":"2020-07-01T16:45:37","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/naroffeconomics.com\/?p=1777"},"modified":"2020-07-01T12:45:37","modified_gmt":"2020-07-01T16:45:37","slug":"june-private-sector-jobs-manufacturing-activity-and-layoffs-and-may-construction-spending","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/naroffeconomics.com\/?p=1777","title":{"rendered":"June Private Sector Jobs, Manufacturing Activity and Layoffs and May Construction Spending"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p><strong><u>KEY DATA:<\/u><\/strong> &nbsp;ADP: +2.37 million\/ ISM (Manufacturing): +9.5 points; Orders: +24.6 points\/ Layoffs: 170,219\/ Construction: -2.1%; Private: -3.3%<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong><u>IN A NUTSHELL:<\/u><\/strong> <strong><em>\u00a0\u201cTomorrow&#8217;s employment report should be good, though there are some real questions about the May one that creates confusion about how strong it will be.\u201d<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong><u>WHAT IT MEANS:<\/u><\/strong> <em>&nbsp;<\/em>Our first reading of the pace that the reopenings are bringing back jobs comes tomorrow when BLS releases the June employment report.&nbsp; Today, <strong><em>the employment services firm ADP released its estimate of June private sector payroll changes and it was pretty much as expected.<\/em><\/strong>&nbsp; <strong><em>Large gains were recorded across all sizes of firms, while most industries added to their workforces.<\/em><\/strong>&nbsp; The only weak areas were information services, mining and management companies.&nbsp; <strong><em>But the confusion about tomorrow comes from ADP\u2019s May numbers, which showed that the job losses, not gains, were even greater than expected.&nbsp; <\/em><\/strong>In essence, they doubled-down on their estimate that the economy did not add jobs, as BLS reported, but actually lost over three million workers.&nbsp; As I noted last month, <strong><em>the ADP and BLS numbers sometimes vary greatly, but it is not normal that they have a different sign.<\/em><\/strong>&nbsp; Thus<strong><em>, it is unclear if the government\u2019s May numbers will be revised significantly and if that is the case, what that means for the June data.<\/em><\/strong>&nbsp; So, stay tuned.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong><em>In line with so many other reports, the Institute for Supply Management\u2019s Manufacturing activity index popped in June.&nbsp; Orders and production surged<\/em><\/strong>, which hardly was a surprise.&nbsp; But also consistent with previous reports, <strong><em>employment and backlogs continued to decline, though at a slower pace. <\/em><\/strong>&nbsp;That does not bode well for employment or production.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong><em>Disappointingly, construction spending continued to decline in May.<\/em><\/strong>&nbsp; The government did its part in trying to get the economy going, but private sector housing and most components of nonresidential construction were off.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong><em>Layoffs continue at a huge pace, but at least the number of announced cutbacks slowed in June.<\/em><\/strong>&nbsp; Challenger, Gray and Christmas reported that June\u2019s number was down 57% from the May total.&nbsp; <strong><em>Still, the second quarter total was twice as large as the previous record that occurred during the dot.com crash in 2001.<\/em><\/strong>&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong><u>IMPLICATIONS:<\/u><\/strong> <strong><em>Tomorrow is a big day as we get both the employment report and the unemployment claims data.&nbsp; It looks like we could have another multi-million job gain<\/em><\/strong>, though who knows what the revisions to May will look like.&nbsp; Regardless of what comes out, <strong><em>the claims numbers cannot be an afterthought.&nbsp; They indicate the extent to which companies and governments continue to shed workers.&nbsp; We need to get those number down dramatically<\/em><\/strong> as it is clear the reopening is not going as planned \u2013 or at least as planned by the early-openers.&nbsp; That has forced the more cautious governors and mayors to slow the process down.&nbsp; By the way, how come no one is talking about how the hot weather will slow the spread of the virus?&nbsp; The sharpest increases in cases have largely been in the hot weather states of Florida, Texas, Arizona, and California.&nbsp; But <strong><em>with investors, bad news on the virus front is viewed as good news and anything that points to some progress on the vaccine front is considered to be fantastic news.&nbsp; As one investment advisor mentioned to me, the strategy is simple: Invest.&nbsp; With the Fed backstopping the markets, that worked quite well in the second quarter.&nbsp;<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>KEY DATA: &nbsp;ADP: +2.37 million\/ ISM (Manufacturing): +9.5 points; Orders: +24.6 points\/ Layoffs: 170,219\/ Construction: -2.1%; Private: -3.3% IN A NUTSHELL: \u00a0\u201cTomorrow&#8217;s employment report should be good, though there are some real questions about the May one that creates confusion about how strong it will be.\u201d WHAT IT MEANS: &nbsp;Our first reading of the pace &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/naroffeconomics.com\/?p=1777\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">June Private Sector Jobs, Manufacturing Activity and Layoffs and May Construction Spending<\/span> <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1777","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/naroffeconomics.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1777","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/naroffeconomics.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/naroffeconomics.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/naroffeconomics.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/naroffeconomics.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=1777"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/naroffeconomics.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1777\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1779,"href":"https:\/\/naroffeconomics.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1777\/revisions\/1779"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/naroffeconomics.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=1777"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/naroffeconomics.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=1777"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/naroffeconomics.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=1777"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}