{"id":1765,"date":"2020-06-17T14:48:55","date_gmt":"2020-06-17T18:48:55","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/naroffeconomics.com\/?p=1765"},"modified":"2020-06-17T14:48:55","modified_gmt":"2020-06-17T18:48:55","slug":"may-housing-starts-and-permits-4","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/naroffeconomics.com\/?p=1765","title":{"rendered":"May Housing Starts and Permits"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p><strong>KEY DATA:<\/strong> &nbsp;Starts: +4.3%; Permits: +14.4%<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>IN A\nNUTSHELL:<\/strong> <strong><em>&nbsp;\u201cThe housing market is setting up to be the\nleading force in the recovery.\u201d<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>WHAT IT\nMEANS:<\/strong> &nbsp;One of the first sectors that was allowed to\nreopen was construction and we are seeing the positives of the decision to do\nthat.&nbsp; If you just looked at the\nconstruction numbers, you might not come to that conclusion.&nbsp; <strong><em>Housing starts rose moderately in May, led\nby a major recovery in the West and a solid gain in the Northeast.<\/em><\/strong>&nbsp; However, weakness persisted in the South and\nMidwest.&nbsp; <strong><em>It was expected that starts would\nrise more<\/em><\/strong>, so this was a bit of a disappointment. <strong><em>&nbsp;Indeed, if you compare the level of starts in May\nto February, you see a nearly 38% decline.&nbsp;\nSo why am I so upbeat?&nbsp; Simple,\nhousing permit requests are soaring.<\/em><\/strong>&nbsp;\n<strong><em>They were up sharply in May<\/em><\/strong> and have are now about 15% below\nthe February level.&nbsp; That seems large,\nbut it can be made up reasonably quickly.&nbsp;\n<strong><em>More importantly, for the last three months, permits were running over\nfourteen percent above starts.&nbsp; Builders\nare not wasting money on permits and the big gap points to a strong increase in\nconstruction over the next couple of months.&nbsp;\n<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong><em>Adding to the belief that the home construction and\nhousing in general will be solid going forward was a report by the Mortgage\nBankers Association.&nbsp; &nbsp;As noted, &#8220;Purchase applications\nincreased to the highest level in over 11 years and for the ninth consecutive\nweek.<\/em><\/strong><em> The housing market\ncontinues to experience the release of unrealized pent-up demand from earlier\nthis spring, as well as a gradual improvement in consumer confidence&#8221;.&nbsp; <\/em>That is very good news for builders, who seem\nprepared to meet the growing demand.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>IMPLICATIONS:<\/strong> <strong><em>The home construction segment\nstill has a long way to go to get back to the pre-virus pace of activity.&nbsp; But while other sectors, such as restaurants\nor manufacturing, may take a very long time to get there, the indicators are\nmounting that housing will be one of the first segments to recover.<\/em><\/strong>&nbsp; Unfortunately, the depressed April and May\nstarts numbers point to home construction restraining second quarter growth\nsignificantly.&nbsp; On the other hand, if the\npermits\/starts gap gets narrowed during the summer as expected, the sector\ncould add greatly to third quarter growth.&nbsp;\n<strong><em>The markets have rallied on what I call false positive reports.&nbsp; Those are numbers that look great, but only\nbecause they started from such a low level.&nbsp;\nWith housing, while the levels remain lower than hoped for, supporting\ndata argue for a major comeback<\/em><\/strong> that could get us within range of the\nFebruary standard of comparison in a reasonable time period.&nbsp; But <strong><em>it is really not clear that the economic\ndata are the major drivers of the markets.&nbsp;\nThe Fed is buying just about anything that is being sold <\/em><\/strong>and\nthat includes individual corporate bonds.&nbsp;\n<strong><em>Mr. Powell has made it clear he doesn\u2019t want to give up the gains \u2013\neven as he claims he doesn\u2019t target the equity indices.&nbsp; Really?<\/em><\/strong>&nbsp; It is best to watch what the Fed does, not\nwhat the Fed Chair says, as he doesn&#8217;t want to appear to be supporting the\nequity markets, which of course he is doing.&nbsp;\n<strong><em>About the only thing he admits he cannot do is to get money into the\nhands of specific household groups.&nbsp; So,\nhe has strongly suggested that Congress get busy doing that.<\/em><\/strong>&nbsp; <strong><em>Let\u2019s see: The Fed is supporting the equity\nand bond markets and the government is supporting businesses and\nhouseholds.&nbsp; Isn\u2019t capitalism great?&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>KEY DATA: &nbsp;Starts: +4.3%; Permits: +14.4% IN A NUTSHELL: &nbsp;\u201cThe housing market is setting up to be the leading force in the recovery.\u201d WHAT IT MEANS: &nbsp;One of the first sectors that was allowed to reopen was construction and we are seeing the positives of the decision to do that.&nbsp; If you just looked at &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/naroffeconomics.com\/?p=1765\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">May Housing Starts and Permits<\/span> <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[3],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1765","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-economic-indicators"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/naroffeconomics.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1765","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/naroffeconomics.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/naroffeconomics.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/naroffeconomics.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/naroffeconomics.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=1765"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/naroffeconomics.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1765\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1766,"href":"https:\/\/naroffeconomics.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1765\/revisions\/1766"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/naroffeconomics.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=1765"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/naroffeconomics.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=1765"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/naroffeconomics.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=1765"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}