{"id":1698,"date":"2020-04-10T09:54:41","date_gmt":"2020-04-10T13:54:41","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/naroffeconomics.com\/?p=1698"},"modified":"2020-04-10T09:54:41","modified_gmt":"2020-04-10T13:54:41","slug":"march-consumer-prices-and-real-earnings","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/naroffeconomics.com\/?p=1698","title":{"rendered":"March Consumer Prices and Real Earnings"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>KEY DATA:<\/strong> &nbsp;CPI: -0.4%; Over-Year: 1.5%; Ex-Energy: 0.0%;\nOver-Year: 2.1%\/ Real Earnings: +0.8%; Over-Year: +1.6%<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>IN A\nNUTSHELL:<\/strong> <strong><em>&nbsp;\u201cInflation is really not doing much, which is\na surprise given the craziness in the economy.\u201d<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>WHAT IT\nMEANS:<\/strong> &nbsp;<strong><em>Consumer prices fell in March, which\nsurprised no one.<\/em><\/strong>&nbsp; Given the\ncollapse in the economy, that was expected.&nbsp;\n<strong><em>But much of that decline was due to a double digit declines in gasoline\nand fuel oil.&nbsp; <\/em><\/strong>The price war\nbetween Russia and Saudi Arabia made that happen and was expected.&nbsp; <strong><em>Excluding energy, costs were flat, which was\na surprise.&nbsp; Food prices, both at home\nand away, were up solidly, while services prices were flat.<\/em><\/strong>&nbsp; In the services component, shelter expenses,\nwhich had been surging, flattened out.&nbsp;\nBut medical costs, which also had been rising sharply, increased even\nmore.&nbsp; Transportation was down\nsharply.&nbsp; <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong><em>The earnings numbers in March implied that workers\ndid really well, as wages rose sharply.<\/em><\/strong>&nbsp;\nAdjusted for the decline in prices, that meant real earnings\nsoared.&nbsp; <strong><em>But these data are\nmisleading.&nbsp; The large rise in average\nhourly wages was due to the way the number is calculated.<\/em><\/strong>&nbsp; It is a weighted average.&nbsp; In March, the huge drop in employment came\nfrom major layoffs in lower paying industries.&nbsp;\nHigher paying sectors lost relatively less.&nbsp; So, <strong><em>when you do a weighted average and you take\nout more from the bottom than the top, the average rises.&nbsp; I don\u2019t think workers did particularly well\nin March.&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>MARKETS AND\nFED POLICY IMPLICATIONS:<\/strong> &nbsp;<strong><em>In\nsome respects the relatively mild decline in consumer prices and the flat\nchange excluding energy is good news.&nbsp; Core\ninflation, which excludes volatile food and energy, had been slowly climbing\nback to target levels.&nbsp; A massive\ncollapse in the economy was expected to lead to a major deceleration in\ninflation, which could be worrisome.&nbsp;\nThat did not happen. <\/em><\/strong>&nbsp;With\nenergy prices bouncing off the bottom, we could see the headline number up in\nApril.&nbsp; Thus, the shut down of the\neconomy has not yet lead to a deflationary environment.&nbsp;<strong><em>It is hard enough to fight a virus-induced\ndecline in economic activity, having to deal with falling prices as well is not\nsomething the Fed wants to face.<\/em><\/strong>&nbsp;\nOf course, getting the economy going again will be the best way to fight\nany decline in inflation.&nbsp; <strong><em>I\nthink the economy will have a \u2018Vu\u2019 recovery.&nbsp;\nWe may get a major rebound, if only because opening closed sectors means\nthat activity will surge. <\/em><\/strong>&nbsp;<strong><em>But\nit is the following few quarters that really matter and it will be hard to\nsustain demand when we start with and unemployment rate that could hit 20%. <\/em><\/strong>&nbsp;The unemployment rate in February was\n3.5%.&nbsp; <strong><em>Getting back to an unemployment\nrate close to that level, and I define close as one percentage point above the\nbottom, could take five years.<\/em><\/strong>&nbsp; <strong><em>That\nwas the pattern in the past and it could easily take that long after this\ncrisis.&nbsp; <\/em><\/strong>That means after the\nrebound, there could be a slowdown as the government\u2019s welfare program fades\nand businesses have to actually earn money to pay for their workers.&nbsp; That would then lead to a slow recovery,\nsimilar to what we saw after the Great Recession.&nbsp; <strong><em>Investors may think that the problems are\nbehind us, but reopening and repairing the economy is not going to be easy and\nit will take a long time.&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>KEY DATA: &nbsp;CPI: -0.4%; Over-Year: 1.5%; Ex-Energy: 0.0%; Over-Year: 2.1%\/ Real Earnings: +0.8%; Over-Year: +1.6% IN A NUTSHELL: &nbsp;\u201cInflation is really not doing much, which is a surprise given the craziness in the economy.\u201d WHAT IT MEANS: &nbsp;Consumer prices fell in March, which surprised no one.&nbsp; Given the collapse in the economy, that was expected.&nbsp; &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/naroffeconomics.com\/?p=1698\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">March Consumer Prices and Real Earnings<\/span> <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1698","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/naroffeconomics.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1698","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/naroffeconomics.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/naroffeconomics.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/naroffeconomics.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/naroffeconomics.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=1698"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/naroffeconomics.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1698\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1699,"href":"https:\/\/naroffeconomics.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1698\/revisions\/1699"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/naroffeconomics.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=1698"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/naroffeconomics.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=1698"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/naroffeconomics.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=1698"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}