{"id":1634,"date":"2020-01-03T11:40:07","date_gmt":"2020-01-03T16:40:07","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/naroffeconomics.com\/?p=1634"},"modified":"2020-01-03T11:40:07","modified_gmt":"2020-01-03T16:40:07","slug":"december-manufacturing-activity-and-november-construction-spending","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/naroffeconomics.com\/?p=1634","title":{"rendered":"December Manufacturing Activity and November Construction Spending"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>KEY DATA:<\/strong> &nbsp;ISM (Manufacturing): -0.9%; Orders: -0.4%;\nProduction: -5.9%; Hiring: -1.5%\/ Construction: +0.6%; Private: +0.4%; Public:\n+0.9%<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>IN A\nNUTSHELL:<\/strong> <strong><em>&nbsp;\u201cManufacturers did not end the year on a high\nnote as the sector continues to contract.\u201d<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>WHAT IT\nMEANS:<\/strong> <strong><em>Last\nyear may have been the best of times for the equity markets but that was hardly\nthe case for the manufacturing sector.&nbsp;\nIn December, the Institute for Supply Management\u2019s index was in the red\nfor the fifth consecutive month.<\/em><\/strong>&nbsp;\n<strong><em>Continued declines in demand led to a sharp drop in production.&nbsp; <\/em><\/strong>Indeed, the production measure was\nthe lowest since April 2009 and lest we forget, that was during the peak of the\nGreat Recession cut backs.&nbsp; <strong><em>The slowdown\nin output has triggered a decline in payrolls. <\/em><\/strong>&nbsp;Four of the six major industry sectors posted\nshrinking employment.&nbsp; Only one was\nup.&nbsp; We could see a negative number in\nthe manufacturing segment of the employment report that will be released next\nFriday.&nbsp; <strong><em>With demand, production and\nbacklogs fading, firms are slimming down and inventories are shrinking.&nbsp; Basically, this report was ugly.<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong><em>While manufacturing may be fading, construction\nseems to be picking up.<\/em><\/strong>&nbsp; Given how soft it had been,\nthat is not a major surprise, though it is welcome news.&nbsp; <strong><em>Both public and private spending was up\nsolidly in November.&nbsp; However, it is still\nthe government that is the driving force as activity was up twice as quickly as\nthe private sector.<\/em><\/strong>&nbsp;\nYear-over-year, November total public construction rose by 12.4%\ncompared to only 1.6% for the private sector.&nbsp;\nThe private sector weakness was largely in nonresidential building,\nwhich fell in both November and over the year.&nbsp;\nResidential activity has picked up, but not by a whole lot.&nbsp; <strong>MARKETS AND FED\nPOLICY IMPLICATIONS:<\/strong><strong><em>The\neconomic data did not provide us with a very merry welcome to 2020.&nbsp; &nbsp;The manufacturing\nsector is not in great shape and even the comments reported in the Supply\nManagers\u2019 report were cautiously optimistic at best. <\/em><\/strong>&nbsp;We don\u2019t know a whole lot about the so-called\nphase one trade agreement with China, but it looks to be mostly centered on\ntrying to keep the farm sector from going bankrupt. But I will hold my judgment\nuntil we see the text.&nbsp; <strong><em>As\nfor the markets, the shift from trade war to potential shooting war with Iran\nwas hardly something investors wanted to see.<\/em><\/strong>&nbsp; The ball is now in Iran\u2019s court and it is\nlikely something bad will be attempted.&nbsp;\nWe just don\u2019t know how big or how long before it occurs.&nbsp; That could keep investors on edge. <strong><em>Concerns\nabout the trade war hardly slowed investors down in 2019, so it is not clear\nthat a shooting war will do much this year.&nbsp;\nKeep in mind, the economy grew at a roughly 2.25% pace last year while\nthe major equity indices soared by well over 20% and even over 30%.<\/em><\/strong><strong><em>That seems to imply that the economy and the\nmarkets are not closely linked.&nbsp; <\/em><\/strong>That\nis something the Fed doesn\u2019t seem to be overly concerned about as the members\ncontinue to pat themselves on their backs for doing such a great job.&nbsp; Well, there goes one of my resolutions.&nbsp; I promised myself I would lay off criticizing\nthe Fed for a while and here I am in my first commentary of the year doing just\nthat.&nbsp; Oh, well, I just calls \u2018em as I\nsees \u2018em.&nbsp; \n\n\n\n<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>KEY DATA: &nbsp;ISM (Manufacturing): -0.9%; Orders: -0.4%; Production: -5.9%; Hiring: -1.5%\/ Construction: +0.6%; Private: +0.4%; Public: +0.9% IN A NUTSHELL: &nbsp;\u201cManufacturers did not end the year on a high note as the sector continues to contract.\u201d WHAT IT MEANS: Last year may have been the best of times for the equity markets but that was &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/naroffeconomics.com\/?p=1634\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">December Manufacturing Activity and November Construction Spending<\/span> <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1634","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/naroffeconomics.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1634","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/naroffeconomics.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/naroffeconomics.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/naroffeconomics.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/naroffeconomics.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=1634"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/naroffeconomics.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1634\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1635,"href":"https:\/\/naroffeconomics.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1634\/revisions\/1635"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/naroffeconomics.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=1634"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/naroffeconomics.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=1634"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/naroffeconomics.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=1634"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}