{"id":1615,"date":"2019-10-17T14:07:22","date_gmt":"2019-10-17T18:07:22","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/naroffeconomics.com\/?p=1615"},"modified":"2019-10-17T14:07:22","modified_gmt":"2019-10-17T18:07:22","slug":"september-industrial-production-housing-starts-october-philadelphia-fed-manufacturing-index-and-weekly-jobless-claims","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/naroffeconomics.com\/?p=1615","title":{"rendered":"September Industrial Production, Housing Starts, October Philadelphia Fed Manufacturing Index and Weekly Jobless Claims"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>KEY DATA:<\/strong> &nbsp;IP: -0.4%; Manufacturing: -0.5%\/ Starts:\n-9.4%; Permits: -2.7%\/ Phil. Fed (Manufacturing): -6.4 points; Expectations:\n+13 points\/ Claims: +4,000<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>IN A\nNUTSHELL:<\/strong> <strong><em>&nbsp;\u201cAnother day, another set of disappointing\neconomic numbers.\u201d<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>WHAT IT\nMEANS:<\/strong> &nbsp;<strong><em>\u201c<\/em><\/strong>And the beat down goes on, and the\nbeat down goes on.&nbsp; The data keep pounding\nthe message into my brain\u201d &#8211; that the economy is slowing!&nbsp; <strong><em>Today, two major reports, industrial\nproduction and housing starts, were released and to put it simply, they were\nnot very good.<\/em><\/strong>&nbsp; &nbsp;<strong><em>Let\u2019s start with output<\/em><\/strong>, which is\nthe Fed\u2019s own data release.&nbsp; <strong><em>The\nkey number was manufacturing, which declined sharply September.&nbsp; The GM strike cratered vehicle production<\/em><\/strong>\nand that was the most glaring drop in the index.&nbsp; However, of the remaining ten components in\nthe durable goods segment, five others were down.&nbsp; Indeed, <strong><em>excluding vehicles, durable good production\nstill fell, though modestly (0.1%).<\/em><\/strong> Also, <strong><em>nondurable goods output declined,\nso you cannot say the weakness in manufacturing was simply a labor-related\nissue.&nbsp; <\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong><em>On the housing front, starts posted a huge decline\nin September.<\/em><\/strong>&nbsp; Again, the number needs to be\nviewed in context.&nbsp; <strong><em>The August number was up over\n15%, to the highest in over twelve years.&nbsp;\n<\/em><\/strong>There didn\u2019t seem to be a logical reason that so high a level\nwould be reached.<strong><em> Consequently, a decline was expected.<\/em><\/strong>&nbsp; But, <strong><em>the September construction pace was pretty\nmuch in line with average for the year<\/em><\/strong> and below the average for the\nquarter, so the best you can say is that homebuilding continues, but it is not\nrising very rapidly.&nbsp; <strong><em>As\nfor the future, permit requests, while down over the month, are still running\nwell above starts, so we should see a pick up in activity over the next few\nmonths.&nbsp; <\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong><em>The Philadelphia Fed\u2019s October manufacturing index\nposted a moderate decline.<\/em><\/strong>&nbsp; This index\nbounces around quite a bit, so what may seem like a large drop was really not\nthat much.&nbsp; <strong><em>Orders remained solid and hiring\npicked up<\/em><\/strong>, which is good news.&nbsp; <strong><em>As\nfor expectations, they were up solidly across the board.<\/em><\/strong> At least in\nthe Mid-Atlantic region, manufacturing may be slowing, but not by much.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Jobless claims remained quite low as firms continue\nto scramble for workers.<strong>MARKETS AND FED POLICY IMPLICATIONS:<\/strong><strong><em>Third\nquarter growth is setting up for a disappointing number.&nbsp; We get the first estimate of GDP on October\n30<sup>th<\/sup> and the FOMC will have the number.&nbsp; Assuming the growth rate comes in close to\nexpectations, which is between 1.5% and 2%, I don\u2019t think it will change any\nthinking.<\/em><\/strong>&nbsp; The minutes of the\nlast meeting and comments from members indicate two things: The trade war is\nthe overarching issue facing the Committee and the members are split on how to\ndeal with the potential impacts, given the outcomes are so potentially\ndifferent.&nbsp; A full-fledged trade\/tariff war\nlikely means recession.&nbsp; An agreement\nmeans more 2% or so growth.&nbsp; So, doing\nmore or doing nothing both come with real risks.&nbsp; That is likely to be the debate.<strong><em> &nbsp;<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>KEY DATA: &nbsp;IP: -0.4%; Manufacturing: -0.5%\/ Starts: -9.4%; Permits: -2.7%\/ Phil. Fed (Manufacturing): -6.4 points; Expectations: +13 points\/ Claims: +4,000 IN A NUTSHELL: &nbsp;\u201cAnother day, another set of disappointing economic numbers.\u201d WHAT IT MEANS: &nbsp;\u201cAnd the beat down goes on, and the beat down goes on.&nbsp; The data keep pounding the message into my brain\u201d &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/naroffeconomics.com\/?p=1615\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">September Industrial Production, Housing Starts, October Philadelphia Fed Manufacturing Index and Weekly Jobless Claims<\/span> <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1615","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/naroffeconomics.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1615","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/naroffeconomics.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/naroffeconomics.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/naroffeconomics.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/naroffeconomics.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=1615"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/naroffeconomics.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1615\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1616,"href":"https:\/\/naroffeconomics.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1615\/revisions\/1616"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/naroffeconomics.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=1615"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/naroffeconomics.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=1615"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/naroffeconomics.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=1615"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}