{"id":1610,"date":"2019-10-10T15:41:52","date_gmt":"2019-10-10T19:41:52","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/naroffeconomics.com\/?p=1610"},"modified":"2019-10-10T15:41:52","modified_gmt":"2019-10-10T19:41:52","slug":"september-consumer-prices-inflation-adjusted-wages-and-weekly-jobless-claims","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/naroffeconomics.com\/?p=1610","title":{"rendered":"September Consumer Prices, Inflation-Adjusted Wages and Weekly Jobless Claims"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>KEY DATA:<\/strong> &nbsp;CPI: 0%; Over-Year: 1.7%; Ex-Food and Energy:\n+0.1%; Over-Year: +2.4%\/ Real Wages: 0%; Over-Year: +1.2%\/ Claims: -10,000<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>IN A\nNUTSHELL:<\/strong> <strong><em>&nbsp;\u201cLimited inflation pressure gives the Fed some\nroom if the divided committee can manage to come up with an agreement.\u201d<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>WHAT IT\nMEANS:<\/strong> &nbsp;<strong><em>Clearly, the economy is not growing too fast\nfor firms to keep up with demand.&nbsp;\nOtherwise we wouldn\u2019t have consumer costs rising so modestly.&nbsp; The Consumer Price Index was flat in\nSeptember and removing the volatile food and energy components left us with\nonly a minimal gain.<\/em><\/strong>&nbsp; Food prices\nbroke a string of three consecutive flat months with a limited 0.1%\nincrease.&nbsp; Not much pressure there,\nunless you are eating out or, as in my case, you like cakes and cupcakes.&nbsp; They are up way too much since September 2018\nand the cost of feeding my bakery sweet tooth is getting out of hand. &nbsp;Energy prices, meanwhile, fell sharply.&nbsp; <strong><em>About the only places where inflation is an\nissue are medical care and shelter.&nbsp; So,\nas long as you don\u2019t have to see a doctor or live in a house or apartment, there\nis basically no inflation.&nbsp; <\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong><em>With overall inflation flat and wages going nowhere,\nit was hardly a surprise that inflation-adjusted, or real wages were also flat.<\/em><\/strong>&nbsp; <strong><em>The over-the-year rise keeps moderating and\nthat is not good news for future consumer demand.<\/em><\/strong>&nbsp; Worse, hours worked have declined over the\npast year and that has meant a slowdown in weekly earnings growth.&nbsp; In other words, <strong><em>household spending power is not\nrising fast enough to support strong consumption unless families dip into\nsavings and it is not clear they have any inclination to do that.<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong><em>The sharp drop in jobless claims last week\nreinforces the view that the slow job growth is due more to a lack of supply\nthan a faltering in demand.&nbsp; <\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>MARKETS AND\nFED POLICY IMPLICATIONS:<\/strong> <strong><em>No inflation really does little to change\nthe feelings of either investors or Fed members.&nbsp; For investors, it is all about trade and\ntariffs.<\/em><\/strong>&nbsp; Indeed, the idea that a\n\u201cmore puff than pastry\u201d agreement, something I have argued was the most likely\nagreement if the two sides ever manage one, is now considered to be the last\ngreat hope for the markets.&nbsp; <strong><em>It is\nbecoming quite clear that a major trade agreement with China is nowhere in\nsight if it is even possible.<\/em><\/strong>&nbsp; Signs\nof progress (however that is defined) or backpedaling lead to major ups and\ndowns in the markets.&nbsp; Since that yo-yo\neffect has been going on for quite some time, I can repeat another of my\nfavorite sayings: The markets may be efficient but that hardly means they are\nrational.&nbsp; <strong><em>Right now, investors are simply\ngrasping for any hope that a total meltdown doesn\u2019t happen.&nbsp; <\/em><\/strong>As for the Fed, the data do not\nsupport a rate cut and they haven\u2019t for months, so I don\u2019t know why I even\ndiscuss that.&nbsp; <strong><em>The minutes from the last FOMC\nmeeting indicate that the only thing driving rate cuts is tariffs.&nbsp; But the Committee is extremely divided <\/em><\/strong>with\njust about every view, from sharp reductions to nothing being represented.&nbsp; Does Jay Powell have an insurrection on his\nhands?&nbsp; I don\u2019t think we can go that far\njust yet, but <strong><em>making additional moves is becoming harder and harder. <\/em><\/strong>&nbsp;I expect no more cuts this year, despite what\nthe markets think.&nbsp; <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>KEY DATA: &nbsp;CPI: 0%; Over-Year: 1.7%; Ex-Food and Energy: +0.1%; Over-Year: +2.4%\/ Real Wages: 0%; Over-Year: +1.2%\/ Claims: -10,000 IN A NUTSHELL: &nbsp;\u201cLimited inflation pressure gives the Fed some room if the divided committee can manage to come up with an agreement.\u201d WHAT IT MEANS: &nbsp;Clearly, the economy is not growing too fast for firms &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/naroffeconomics.com\/?p=1610\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">September Consumer Prices, Inflation-Adjusted Wages and Weekly Jobless Claims<\/span> <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1610","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/naroffeconomics.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1610","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/naroffeconomics.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/naroffeconomics.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/naroffeconomics.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/naroffeconomics.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=1610"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/naroffeconomics.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1610\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1611,"href":"https:\/\/naroffeconomics.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1610\/revisions\/1611"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/naroffeconomics.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=1610"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/naroffeconomics.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=1610"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/naroffeconomics.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=1610"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}