{"id":1594,"date":"2019-09-12T12:31:20","date_gmt":"2019-09-12T16:31:20","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/naroffeconomics.com\/?p=1594"},"modified":"2019-09-12T12:31:20","modified_gmt":"2019-09-12T16:31:20","slug":"august-consumer-prices-and-real-earnings-and-weekly-jobless-claims","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/naroffeconomics.com\/?p=1594","title":{"rendered":"August Consumer Prices and Real Earnings and Weekly Jobless Claims"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>KEY DATA:<\/strong> CPI: +0.1%; Over-Year:\n+1.7%; Ex-Food and Energy: +0.3%; Over-Year: +2.4%\/ Real Earnings: +0.4%;\nOver-Year: +1.5%\/ Claims: -15,000<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>IN A\nNUTSHELL:<\/strong> <strong><em>&nbsp;\u201cWhether or not inflation is low depends upon\nthe measure you use.\u201d<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>WHAT IT\nMEANS:<\/strong> &nbsp;Is inflation tame?&nbsp; The answer is, as it usually is with economic\ndata, it depends.&nbsp; <strong><em>Today\u2019s inflation report was the\nAugust Consumer Price Index.&nbsp; The rise\nwas modest, as long as you include food and energy<\/em><\/strong>, which tend to\nbounce around.&nbsp; Indeed, <strong><em>energy\ncosts fell sharply while food costs were flat.&nbsp;\nExcluding those components, though, consumer prices were up fairly\nsharply. <\/em><\/strong>What is driving that increase?&nbsp;\nIn August, it was a number of factors.&nbsp;\nIf you eat out, your tab keeps rising faster than most other goods.&nbsp; If you are feeding a cake, cupcake and cookie\nhabit, like me, you are paying more for those as well.&nbsp; <strong><em>Medical expenses are once again soaring. <\/em><\/strong>&nbsp;Men\u2019s clothing prices are jumping as are\nwomen\u2019s footwear.&nbsp; Information expenses\nhave risen solidly three of the past four months.&nbsp; <strong><em>Shelter costs are seemingly always rising<\/em><\/strong>\nand if you travel, not only are airplanes uncomfortable but they are more\nexpensive.&nbsp; <strong><em>And used vehicle prices are\nsoaring.&nbsp; In other words, there are lots\nof goods and services whose costs are moving upward<\/em><\/strong>, at least according\nto the Consumer Price Index.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong><em>One of the problems with rising inflation is that it\neats into consumer spending power.&nbsp; At\nleast in August, the modest top line increase allowed inflation-adjusted\nearnings to surge. <\/em><\/strong>&nbsp;Both hourly wages and hours\nworked were up nicely and the inflation offset was limited.&nbsp; That led to a strong gain in consumer\nspending power.&nbsp; That said, <strong><em>the\n1.5% rise over the year is nothing great and makes it hard to see how consumers\ncan continue to keep the economy growing strongly without some help from other\nsectors.<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong><em>One bit of really good news was the sharp decline in\nweekly jobless claims.&nbsp; It is near its\nhistoric low level.<\/em><\/strong>&nbsp; That shows that <strong><em>the\nlabor market remains tight<\/em><\/strong>, which should limit the deceleration in wage\ngains.&nbsp; <strong>MARKETS AND FED\nPOLICY IMPLICATIONS:<\/strong> &nbsp;The Fed is\nalways mentioning that inflation remains below target, though they continuously\nstate that it will eventually get back there.&nbsp;\n<strong><em>The Fed uses the Personal Consumption Expenditure deflator as its\nbenchmark and indeed, when you exclude the volatile food and energy components,\ninflation is below the 2% target.&nbsp; But\nthat is not the case with other measures.&nbsp;\n<\/em><\/strong>The core Consumer Price Index, which excludes food and energy,\nis now rising faster than it has in eleven years.&nbsp; There are a number of other indices that use\nthe CPI but try to factor out volatile elements.&nbsp; <strong><em>The Cleveland Fed\u2019s median and trimmed mean\nCPIs and the Atlanta Fed\u2019s Sticky Price CPI are also up at their highest pace\nthis decade. <\/em><\/strong><strong><em>In\nother words, there are some reasons to believe inflation is not nearly as tame\nas Mr. Powell thinks.<\/em><\/strong>&nbsp; We will\nget the next reading of the PCE price index in two weeks and that is likely to\nremain below target.&nbsp; What will be\nimportant is how much the core index rises and how close it gets to 2%.&nbsp; The July increase over the year was only\n1.6%, so it still has a way to go.&nbsp; <strong><em>As\nfor the markets, it is still all about trade and when hopes rise that the war\nwill not go nuclear, markets do well.&nbsp;\nWhen threats of a greater war are raised, the fallout shelter becomes a\nfavorite place to hide.<\/em><\/strong><strong><em>Right\nnow, the news is positive.&nbsp; If you know\nwhat it will be tomorrow, please tell me so we both know.&nbsp; <\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>KEY DATA: CPI: +0.1%; Over-Year: +1.7%; Ex-Food and Energy: +0.3%; Over-Year: +2.4%\/ Real Earnings: +0.4%; Over-Year: +1.5%\/ Claims: -15,000 IN A NUTSHELL: &nbsp;\u201cWhether or not inflation is low depends upon the measure you use.\u201d WHAT IT MEANS: &nbsp;Is inflation tame?&nbsp; The answer is, as it usually is with economic data, it depends.&nbsp; Today\u2019s inflation report &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/naroffeconomics.com\/?p=1594\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">August Consumer Prices and Real Earnings and Weekly Jobless Claims<\/span> <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1594","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/naroffeconomics.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1594","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/naroffeconomics.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/naroffeconomics.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/naroffeconomics.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/naroffeconomics.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=1594"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/naroffeconomics.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1594\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1595,"href":"https:\/\/naroffeconomics.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1594\/revisions\/1595"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/naroffeconomics.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=1594"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/naroffeconomics.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=1594"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/naroffeconomics.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=1594"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}