{"id":1551,"date":"2019-06-14T10:47:42","date_gmt":"2019-06-14T14:47:42","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/naroffeconomics.com\/?p=1551"},"modified":"2019-06-14T10:47:42","modified_gmt":"2019-06-14T14:47:42","slug":"may-retail-sales-and-industrial-production","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/naroffeconomics.com\/?p=1551","title":{"rendered":"May Retail Sales and Industrial Production"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>KEY DATA:<\/strong> Sales: +0.5%; Ex-Vehicles:\n+0.5%\/ IP: +0.4%; Manufacturing +0.2%<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>IN A\nNUTSHELL:<\/strong> <strong><em>&nbsp;\u201cConsumers are consuming, even if\nmanufacturers are not manufacturing.\u201d<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>WHAT IT\nMEANS:<\/strong> &nbsp;<strong><em>Consumer spending meet Samuel Clemens: The\nreports of their demise were both greatly exaggerated.<\/em><\/strong>&nbsp; But don\u2019t blame economists, please.&nbsp; <strong><em>The April retail sales numbers, which\ninitially came in as down, were revised to show a decent rise instead.<\/em><\/strong>&nbsp; The government got the magnitude right but\nthe sign wrong.&nbsp; Duh.&nbsp; And in any event, economists expected and got\na sharp improvement in May.&nbsp; We thought\nhouseholds were spending decently and that is exactly what is going on.&nbsp; <strong><em>In May, demand rose in almost every major\ncategory, including vehicles, sporting goods, restaurants, electronics and\nappliances, general merchandise, health care and on the Internet.<\/em><\/strong>&nbsp; Food and beverage stores were down modestly,\nwhile <strong><em>the shrinking department store component, not surprisingly, posted a\nlarge decline<\/em><\/strong>.&nbsp; Those sales are\nbeing picked up elsewhere, which is why all those stores are closing.&nbsp;&nbsp; Finally, there is a so-called \u201ccore\u201d retail\nsales number that best approximates the consumption number in the GDP\nreport.&nbsp; It excludes vehicles, gasoline,\nbuilding supplies and food services and was up strongly in May and (after revision)\nmoderately in April.&nbsp; <strong><em>In\nother words, households are still shopping. <\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong><em>As for the weakest link, industrial production rose\nin May as manufacturing posted its first gain of the year.&nbsp; But let\u2019s face it, a modest rise after large\ndeclines in January, February and April (March was flat) doesn\u2019t tell me that\nthe industrial heartland is doing fine.<\/em><\/strong>&nbsp; Manufacturing\nproduction is up less 1% over the year, which really says it all.&nbsp; Indeed, what saved the sector were rebounds\nin the output of vehicles, plastics and electrical equipment, which had been faltering\nmuch of this year.&nbsp; I am not sure that those\nincreases represent a reversal of fortune or just a temporary uptick.&nbsp; Overall industrial production was helped by a\njump in utility output, but it is not clear if that was due to improved industry\ndemand or weather conditions.&nbsp; &nbsp;<strong>MARKETS AND FED POLICY IMPLICATIONS:<\/strong><strong><em>When\nthe markets find a sucker they move mercilessly and it appears that Jay Powell\nis that target right now.&nbsp; Amazingly, there\nare a fair number of analysts that think we could get a rate cut at next week\u2019s\nFOMC meeting.&nbsp; Really?&nbsp; Meanwhile, the July meeting is considered a\nlay up.&nbsp; I just don\u2019t believe it.<\/em><\/strong><strong><em>Granted, the economy is not booming, but it\nis also not faltering and today\u2019s data make that clear.<\/em><\/strong> Yes, the Fed\nChair has shown that if the markets huff and puff enough they can blow down the\nwill of the Fed.&nbsp; They did that in\nDecember and that has given investors the confidence that they can pressure the\nFed to provide the drug of choice, liquidity, whenever the going gets tough.&nbsp; <strong><em>If we do get a rate cut, the markets will\nlikely rally, despite the reality that a 25 basis point reduction will do\nabsolutely nothing to the economy.<\/em><\/strong> But hey, there is so much out there\nthese days that bears no resemblance to reality that adding the Fed to the list\nwould not surprise me.&nbsp; I grew up\nwatching Rod Serling\u2019s \u201cThe Twilight Zone\u201d and now we seem to be living\nit.&nbsp; \n\n\n\n<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>KEY DATA: Sales: +0.5%; Ex-Vehicles: +0.5%\/ IP: +0.4%; Manufacturing +0.2% IN A NUTSHELL: &nbsp;\u201cConsumers are consuming, even if manufacturers are not manufacturing.\u201d WHAT IT MEANS: &nbsp;Consumer spending meet Samuel Clemens: The reports of their demise were both greatly exaggerated.&nbsp; But don\u2019t blame economists, please.&nbsp; The April retail sales numbers, which initially came in as down, &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/naroffeconomics.com\/?p=1551\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">May Retail Sales and Industrial Production<\/span> <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[3],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1551","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-economic-indicators"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/naroffeconomics.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1551","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/naroffeconomics.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/naroffeconomics.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/naroffeconomics.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/naroffeconomics.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=1551"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/naroffeconomics.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1551\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1552,"href":"https:\/\/naroffeconomics.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1551\/revisions\/1552"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/naroffeconomics.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=1551"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/naroffeconomics.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=1551"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/naroffeconomics.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=1551"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}