{"id":1542,"date":"2019-06-05T12:11:57","date_gmt":"2019-06-05T16:11:57","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/naroffeconomics.com\/?p=1542"},"modified":"2019-06-05T12:11:57","modified_gmt":"2019-06-05T16:11:57","slug":"may-private-sector-jobs-non-manufacturing-activity-and-help-wanted-online","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/naroffeconomics.com\/?p=1542","title":{"rendered":"May Private Sector Jobs, Non-Manufacturing Activity and Help Wanted OnLine"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>KEY DATA:<\/strong> ADP: 27,000; Construction:\n-36,000; Small Businesses: -52,000\/ ISM (Non-Man.): +1.4 points: Orders: +0.5\npoint\/ HWOL: -2.3%<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>IN A\nNUTSHELL:<\/strong> <strong><em>&nbsp;\u201cApril\u2019s employment surge may have been an\naberration as May is looking a lot softer.\u201d<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>WHAT IT\nMEANS:<\/strong> &nbsp;When the April jobs report showed that 263,000\nnew positions were created, I warned that this might be just one of those\ntemporary blips that we get in the data and that May\u2019s number could be a lot\nweaker.&nbsp; Well, we will know for sure on\nFriday, but the ADP estimate of private sector job gains seems to point to that\nbeing the case.&nbsp; <strong><em>Businesses added few new workers\nin May and the details were pretty gruesome.&nbsp;\nSmall business payrolls shrank dramatically.<\/em><\/strong>&nbsp; It\u2019s not just that smaller companies cannot\ncompete on wages in a tight labor market but the changing structure of retail\ndemand is putting a lot of them out of business.&nbsp; That said, there was only a minimal gain in\nmid-sized company payrolls, so not a lot of firms are finding it easy to\nhire.&nbsp; <strong><em>There was also a huge drop in\nconstruction workers, but that came after a strong gain in April.&nbsp; <\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong><em>Supporting the possibility of a disappointing May\njobs report was a solid decline in the Conference Board\u2019s Help Wanted Online\nIndex.<\/em><\/strong>&nbsp; Every region and almost every state posted\nlower online ads for workers.&nbsp; Similarly,\n<strong><em>reductions\nwere seen in almost every occupation category, so you can say this was an\neconomy-wide issue.&nbsp; <\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong><em>While the job market seemed to falter in May, the\nnonmanufacturing portion of the economy continued to do okay.&nbsp; The Institute for Supply Management reported\nits index rose as new order growth accelerated.<\/em><\/strong> Business activity in the\nservice and construction segments of the economy improved quite solidly.&nbsp; Unlike the other surveys released today, <strong><em>the\nISM employment index rose.<\/em><\/strong>&nbsp; The\nin the non-manufacturing segment, however, stands in contrast to the May\nmanufacturing report, which declined, led by a sharp shrinkage in order\nbooks.&nbsp; That does not bode well for\nfuture production.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>MARKETS AND\nFED POLICY IMPLICATIONS:<\/strong> <strong><em>All eyes are on trade discussions, but the\ntariffs and threats of additional tariffs may already be starting to have an\nimpact on growth.<\/em><\/strong>&nbsp; I don\u2019t expect\nthe jobs report to come in at double digits, but <strong><em>a low triple-digit May jobs number\nis a real possibility.<\/em><\/strong>&nbsp; That\nwould bring the average for the three months close to expectations and show\nthat the April number was foolish.&nbsp; But\ngiven the equity markets\u2019 sensitivity to any weak number, it could create an\noutsized impact.&nbsp; <strong><em>Investors are counting on the Fed\nto bail out the economy but they are fooling themselves.&nbsp; The Fed has limited ammunition to fight a\nslowdown.&nbsp; Let\u2019s face it, if the Fed has\nto go below one percent again, it will be in trouble.&nbsp; <\/em><\/strong>The only reason to go that low is if\nthe economy is in deep trouble and not a lot of businesses will be making major\ncapital spending decisions or households buying big-ticket items under those\ncircumstances<strong><em>. &nbsp;<\/em><\/strong>Interest rate cuts\nwould have limited impacts. &nbsp;<strong><em>The\nFed has a little more than one percentage point of rate cuts before it\neffectively runs out of ammunition. It would need a lot more than that to turn\naround a faltering economy.&nbsp; And with the\nU.S. budget deficit nearing one trillion dollars, fiscal policy is in a\nstraight jacket.<\/em><\/strong>&nbsp; <strong><em>So we\nbetter hope that a major slowdown doesn\u2019t occur anytime soon or to quote George\nH.W. Bush, we will be in \u201cdeep doodoo\u201d.&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>KEY DATA: ADP: 27,000; Construction: -36,000; Small Businesses: -52,000\/ ISM (Non-Man.): +1.4 points: Orders: +0.5 point\/ HWOL: -2.3% IN A NUTSHELL: &nbsp;\u201cApril\u2019s employment surge may have been an aberration as May is looking a lot softer.\u201d WHAT IT MEANS: &nbsp;When the April jobs report showed that 263,000 new positions were created, I warned that this &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/naroffeconomics.com\/?p=1542\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">May Private Sector Jobs, Non-Manufacturing Activity and Help Wanted OnLine<\/span> <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1542","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/naroffeconomics.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1542","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/naroffeconomics.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/naroffeconomics.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/naroffeconomics.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/naroffeconomics.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=1542"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/naroffeconomics.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1542\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1543,"href":"https:\/\/naroffeconomics.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1542\/revisions\/1543"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/naroffeconomics.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=1542"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/naroffeconomics.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=1542"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/naroffeconomics.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=1542"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}