{"id":1535,"date":"2019-05-23T12:02:11","date_gmt":"2019-05-23T16:02:11","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/naroffeconomics.com\/?p=1535"},"modified":"2019-05-23T12:02:11","modified_gmt":"2019-05-23T16:02:11","slug":"april-new-home-sales-and-weekly-jobless-claims","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/naroffeconomics.com\/?p=1535","title":{"rendered":"April New Home Sales and Weekly Jobless Claims"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>KEY DATA:<\/strong> New Home Sales: -6.9%;\nOver-Year: +7%; Prices: 8.8%\/ Claims: -1,000<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>IN A\nNUTSHELL:<\/strong> <strong><em>&nbsp;\u201cThe new home market is doing better than the\nexisting home sector, but neither is in great shape.\u201d<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>WHAT IT\nMEANS:<\/strong> &nbsp;<strong><em>Earlier this week we saw that existing home\nsales dropped in April, despite easing mortgage rates and today it was reported\nthat new home demand also dropped. <\/em><\/strong>&nbsp;However, the decline in new home sales came\nafter a huge jump in March, so what we really have is a movement back toward a\nmore realistic level.&nbsp; Unfortunately,\nthat level is not particularly high.&nbsp;\nIndeed, <strong><em>we need about a fifteen percent rise in purchases before we can categorize\nthe new home sales pace as strong. <\/em><\/strong>&nbsp;<strong><em>Nevertheless, sales are on the upswing and\nwe could see a double-digit increase over the 2018 totals.<\/em><\/strong> So far this\nyear, total sales were up nearly seven percent and given how soft they were in\nthe second half of last year, it would take a collapse in demand not to get at\nleast a ten percent rise.&nbsp; As for the\nApril report details, the one region reporting a rise was the Northeast, but\nthat area makes up only about five percent of the total.&nbsp; The other three regions were down\nsharply.&nbsp; <strong><em>The median price jumped<\/em><\/strong>,\nbut I would be cautious about the number.&nbsp;\nThe distribution of sales across the price ranges has been strangely\nvolatile the last few months, so let\u2019s see what happens when things settle\ndown.&nbsp;&nbsp; <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong><em>New unemployment claims remain at incredibly low\nlevels, a sign that the labor market remains extremely tight. <\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">There were a couple of other reports released today\nthat need to be looked at carefully.&nbsp; <strong><em>The\nApril IHS Market manufacturing index fell to its lowest level since September\n2009 while the services index dropped to its lowest point in over three\nyears.&nbsp; We\u2019ve known for a while that\nmanufacturing is hurting but services may be following in its footsteps.<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>MARKETS AND\nFED POLICY IMPLICATIONS:<\/strong> &nbsp;<strong><em>The\nnew home market may be outperforming the existing home market, but together,\nhousing is not really doing much for the economy.&nbsp; In addition, more and more data are pointing\nto troubles in manufacturing<\/em><\/strong>, in no small part because of trade\nissues.&nbsp; And welfare payments are holding\nup the farm sector, which could get crushed once again by the tariff war.&nbsp; <strong><em>Yet the labor market continues to boom and\nCEO surveys point to business leaders being almost irrationally exuberant.<\/em><\/strong>&nbsp; <strong><em>In addition, households are pretty happy as\nwell.&nbsp; So, what is going on? <\/em><\/strong>&nbsp;I guess it is time for my favorite saying:\n\u201cYou tell me and we both know!\u201d&nbsp; <strong><em>I\nhave growth below two percent this quarter but I am somewhat below\nconsensus.&nbsp; On the other hand, I haven\u2019t\nseen a whole lot of 3% estimates.&nbsp; <\/em><\/strong>Households\ncontinue to hold the key to the economic kingdom.&nbsp; April vehicle sales were pathetic and if we\ndon\u2019t see a sharp rebound in May, consumption could be really\ndisappointing.&nbsp; That would make it\nextremely hard to get to two percent growth, so I am sticking with my\nforecast.&nbsp; <strong><em>The minutes of the last FOMC\nmeeting indicated the members were more upbeat about growth.&nbsp; Even so, they don\u2019t expect to raise rates\nthis year and a slowing in growth would only support that. <\/em><\/strong>&nbsp;<strong><em>It would likely take at least two\nconsecutive sub-two percent quarters to create a rate cut groundswell.&nbsp; So, rates are likely to remain steady for\nquite some time.&nbsp; <\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>KEY DATA: New Home Sales: -6.9%; Over-Year: +7%; Prices: 8.8%\/ Claims: -1,000 IN A NUTSHELL: &nbsp;\u201cThe new home market is doing better than the existing home sector, but neither is in great shape.\u201d WHAT IT MEANS: &nbsp;Earlier this week we saw that existing home sales dropped in April, despite easing mortgage rates and today it &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/naroffeconomics.com\/?p=1535\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">April New Home Sales and Weekly Jobless Claims<\/span> <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[3],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1535","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-economic-indicators"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/naroffeconomics.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1535","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/naroffeconomics.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/naroffeconomics.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/naroffeconomics.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/naroffeconomics.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=1535"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/naroffeconomics.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1535\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1536,"href":"https:\/\/naroffeconomics.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1535\/revisions\/1536"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/naroffeconomics.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=1535"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/naroffeconomics.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=1535"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/naroffeconomics.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=1535"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}