{"id":1526,"date":"2019-05-10T09:56:46","date_gmt":"2019-05-10T13:56:46","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/naroffeconomics.com\/?p=1526"},"modified":"2019-05-10T09:56:46","modified_gmt":"2019-05-10T13:56:46","slug":"april-consumer-prices-and-real-earnings-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/naroffeconomics.com\/?p=1526","title":{"rendered":"April Consumer Prices and Real Earnings"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>KEY DATA:<\/strong> CPI: +0.3%; Ex-Food and\nEnergy: +0.1%; Food: -0.1%; Energy: +2.9%\/ Real Hourly Earnings: -0.1%;\nOver-Year: +1.2%<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>IN A\nNUTSHELL:<\/strong> <strong><em>&nbsp;\u201cInflation is neither too hot nor too cold,\nbut for the Fed, it is hardly just right.\u201d<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>WHAT IT\nMEANS:<\/strong> &nbsp;Normally, news about inflation would take\ncenter stage and it should.&nbsp; So let\u2019s\nkeep it there, even though there are now higher tariffs on Chinese\nimports.&nbsp; <strong><em>Consumer prices rose solidly in\nApril, but much of the gain came from a surge in energy costs<\/em><\/strong>.&nbsp; Meanwhile, food prices dipped.&nbsp; Netting out those two volatile sectors,\nprices rose modestly for the third consecutive month.&nbsp; <strong><em>Over the year, both headline and core prices\nwere up about two percent, so the Fed\u2019s target has been reached, at least for\nthis measure.&nbsp; <\/em><\/strong>The details of the\nreport were a bit odd.&nbsp; <strong><em>Clothing\nprices cratered again<\/em><\/strong>, but there was a change in the data collection\nprocess, so maybe we should also exclude clothing.&nbsp; And <strong><em>there was a large drop in used vehicle\ncosts, but it is unclear why that is happening given all the vehicles coming\noff of lease.<\/em><\/strong>&nbsp; Maybe we should\nexclude that too.&nbsp; And while I am at\nit&#8230;&nbsp; Okay, just kidding around.&nbsp; &nbsp;Not\nreally.&nbsp; There is a serious point in\nsaying we should exclude most components.&nbsp;\n<strong><em>The Fed claims there are transient factors restraining inflation and we\nhave to determine which ones they are referring to and how much of an impact\nthey are having.&nbsp; Right now, core<\/em><\/strong>\n\u2013 i.e., non-food and energy &#8211; <strong><em>prices rose at a less than two percent pace\nover the past three months.&nbsp; How long\nwill the Fed wait to see if the impacts are indeed transient? <\/em><\/strong>&nbsp;The one factor that we can agree is not\ntransient is the continued surge in housing costs.&nbsp; Those should remain high for an extended\nperiod.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong><em>With prices up solidly but hourly and weekly\nearnings rising more slowly, real, or inflation-adjusted earnings fell in\nApril.&nbsp; Consumer spending power has grown\nabout one percent over the year and that is hardly enough to support strong\nconsumption growth.&nbsp; <\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>MARKETS AND\nFED POLICY IMPLICATIONS:<\/strong> &nbsp;Today\u2019s news\non inflation may disappear in the uproar about the raising of tariffs on\nChinese imports and the threats to broaden them to all Chinese products.&nbsp; But <strong><em>consumer prices are something that need to\nbe watched.&nbsp; It\u2019s not that inflation is\nlikely to soar; there is little reason to believe that.&nbsp; It is that the tariffs are passed through to\nconsumers. <\/em><\/strong>&nbsp;The tariffs affect\nonly a small percentage of the economy, so the pass though of the costs should\nnot raise consumer prices significantly.&nbsp;\nBut <strong><em>the impacts don\u2019t fall evenly across income groups.&nbsp; In addition, inflation-adjusted earnings are\ngrowing modestly and the combination of higher tariffs and slow spending power\ndoes not bode well for consumption going forward.<\/em><\/strong>&nbsp; First quarter household spending was weak and\nApril\u2019s vehicle sales were really soft, so second quarter consumer demand may\nnot be that much better.&nbsp; Meanwhile, <strong><em>the\ntariffs only make the Fed\u2019s job more difficult.<\/em><\/strong>&nbsp; They slow growth but may raise inflation\nenough to keep it near the Fed\u2019s target.&nbsp;\nYet any agreement would unwind those impacts, whipsawing the data.&nbsp; <strong><em>With no clear idea where the economy and\ninflation are going, the Fed will likely stay on hold for a long time.&nbsp; &nbsp;<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>KEY DATA: CPI: +0.3%; Ex-Food and Energy: +0.1%; Food: -0.1%; Energy: +2.9%\/ Real Hourly Earnings: -0.1%; Over-Year: +1.2% IN A NUTSHELL: &nbsp;\u201cInflation is neither too hot nor too cold, but for the Fed, it is hardly just right.\u201d WHAT IT MEANS: &nbsp;Normally, news about inflation would take center stage and it should.&nbsp; So let\u2019s keep &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/naroffeconomics.com\/?p=1526\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">April Consumer Prices and Real Earnings<\/span> <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1526","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/naroffeconomics.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1526","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/naroffeconomics.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/naroffeconomics.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/naroffeconomics.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/naroffeconomics.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=1526"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/naroffeconomics.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1526\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1527,"href":"https:\/\/naroffeconomics.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1526\/revisions\/1527"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/naroffeconomics.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=1526"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/naroffeconomics.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=1526"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/naroffeconomics.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=1526"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}