{"id":1486,"date":"2019-03-29T10:44:43","date_gmt":"2019-03-29T14:44:43","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/naroffeconomics.com\/?p=1486"},"modified":"2019-03-29T10:44:43","modified_gmt":"2019-03-29T14:44:43","slug":"march-consumer-confidence-february-income-and-new-home-sales","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/naroffeconomics.com\/?p=1486","title":{"rendered":"March Consumer Confidence, February Income and New Home Sales"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>KEY DATA:<\/strong> Confidence: +4.6 points\/\nFeb. Income: +0.2%; Jan. Income: -0.2%; Jan. Spending: +0.1%\/ New Home Sales:\n+4.9%; Prices: -3.6%<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>IN A\nNUTSHELL:<\/strong> <strong><em>&nbsp;\u201cThe consumer started the year in the doldrums\nbut a pick up in confidence may lead to better spending in the months to come.\u201d<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>WHAT IT\nMEANS:<\/strong> &nbsp;<strong><em>Households have not been happy with the\nworld and they showed it through declining confidence and weak spending.&nbsp; Hopefully, that may be changing.&nbsp; First of all, confidence rebounded in March. <\/em><\/strong>&nbsp;The University of Michigan\u2019s Consumer\nSentiment Index jumped with both the current conditions and expectations\ncomponents rising solidly.&nbsp; Maybe the\nmost important data in the report was a rise in expected income changes.&nbsp; <strong><em>Lower and middle-income households expect\ntheir wages and salaries to increase at a faster pace and that could trigger\ngreater spending.<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">We have the March confidence numbers, but only the\nJanuary and February income and spending number and they are not that great<strong><em>.&nbsp; Income rose moderately in February but was\ndown in January. There were no components that were strong and wage and salary\ngains were mediocre.<\/em><\/strong>&nbsp; Meanwhile, <strong><em>consumption\nrose only modestly in January after having cratered in December.<\/em><\/strong>&nbsp; (The government shutdown has messed up the\ntiming of the data releases.)&nbsp; <strong><em>With\nvehicle sales soft in February, I don\u2019t expect the February consumption numbers\nwill be very good either.&nbsp; <\/em><\/strong>In\nother words, even if spending rebounds in March, as the rise in confidence\nseems to indicate, first quarter consumption should be quite modest.&nbsp; And that points to a weak first quarter GDP\nnumber.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong><em>But then there is the weakest link, housing.&nbsp; New home sales rebounded sharply in February\nand the January sales pace, which was initially estimated to be pretty tepid,\nwas revised up significantly.<\/em><\/strong>&nbsp; That\nconfirms the huge jump in existing home demand in February.&nbsp; It looks like <strong><em>the housing market may be coming\nback<\/em><\/strong>.&nbsp; With mortgage rates down\nin March and prices leveling out, we could see continued improvement in this\nkey sector. &nbsp;Still, the gains were in\nlimited to two regions, the Northeast and Midwest, so let\u2019s wait and see if\nweather was a critical factor in the improvement. <strong>MARKETS AND FED POLICY IMPLICATIONS:<\/strong><strong><em>I\nhave argued that the economy was not nearly as bad as it seemed and there could\nbe a rebound in the spring and summer.&nbsp;\nThe recent data are more mixed than they had been and that is good given\nhow poor the numbers were for a couple of months.&nbsp; But don\u2019t expect growth to surge.<\/em><\/strong>&nbsp; I am not sure we will even average 2.5%\nduring the middle portion of the year and by year\u2019s end, even that pace could\nbe a thing of the past.&nbsp; Think closer to\n2%.&nbsp; That is not a recession, but it is\nnot anything that makes people feel good.&nbsp;\n&nbsp;It is growth that could be enough\nto accelerate pressure on wages, which is needed since worker compensation\nnumbers are up but not so good that consumption can be strong.&nbsp; In other words, <strong><em>unless some positive shock hits\nthe economy, by the fall, we are likely to be back to where we were before the\ntax cut bill was passed.&nbsp; <\/em><\/strong>What\ndoes this mean for the Fed?&nbsp; It is all\nabout inflation.&nbsp; If it remains\ncontained, there is no reason for the gang that cannot think straight to make\nany move.&nbsp; And for me, that is a problem\nbecause the current level of rates is simply too low to provide much ammunition\nwhen the next downturn hits. \n\n\n\n<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>KEY DATA: Confidence: +4.6 points\/ Feb. Income: +0.2%; Jan. Income: -0.2%; Jan. Spending: +0.1%\/ New Home Sales: +4.9%; Prices: -3.6% IN A NUTSHELL: &nbsp;\u201cThe consumer started the year in the doldrums but a pick up in confidence may lead to better spending in the months to come.\u201d WHAT IT MEANS: &nbsp;Households have not been happy &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/naroffeconomics.com\/?p=1486\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">March Consumer Confidence, February Income and New Home Sales<\/span> <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[3],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1486","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-economic-indicators"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/naroffeconomics.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1486","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/naroffeconomics.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/naroffeconomics.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/naroffeconomics.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/naroffeconomics.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=1486"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/naroffeconomics.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1486\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1487,"href":"https:\/\/naroffeconomics.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1486\/revisions\/1487"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/naroffeconomics.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=1486"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/naroffeconomics.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=1486"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/naroffeconomics.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=1486"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}