{"id":1436,"date":"2019-01-11T10:08:55","date_gmt":"2019-01-11T15:08:55","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/naroffeconomics.com\/?p=1436"},"modified":"2019-01-11T10:08:57","modified_gmt":"2019-01-11T15:08:57","slug":"december-consumer-prices-and-real-earnings","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/naroffeconomics.com\/?p=1436","title":{"rendered":"December Consumer Prices and Real Earnings"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong><br><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>KEY DATA:<\/strong> CPI: -0.1%; Excluding\nEnergy: +0.2%; Gasoline: -7.4%\/ Inflation-Adjusted Hourly Earnings: +0.5%; Over\nYear: 1.1%<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>IN A\nNUTSHELL:<\/strong> <strong><em>&nbsp;\u00e2\u20ac\u0153Inflation continues at a pace that should\nmake the Fed happy, but accelerating wage gains remain a threat.\u00e2\u20ac\u009d<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>WHAT IT\nMEANS:<\/strong> &nbsp;While parts of the government\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s data mill are\nshut down, the Bureau of Labor Statistics keeps churning some key numbers.&nbsp; <strong><em>Consumer Prices declined in December, led,\nnot surprisingly by a sharp drop in energy costs. <\/em><\/strong>&nbsp;<strong><em>Excluding energy, consumer costs rose at a\nmoderate pace.&nbsp; <\/em><\/strong>Over the year, the\ncore index, which excludes food and energy, increased at a 2.2% rate, slightly\nabove the Fed\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s 2% target.&nbsp; Looking at\nthe non-energy components, inflation pressures are building in a number of\nareas.&nbsp; <strong><em>Food costs, which had jumped in\n2017 but stabilized last year, look like they could be back on the rise.<\/em><\/strong>&nbsp; The drive to eat healthier is becoming much\nmore expensive as fish and seafood costs are jumping.&nbsp; My biggest concern is that my bellowed cake\nand cupcake prices are skyrocketing.&nbsp;\nTime to diet again.&nbsp; <strong><em>Eating\nout is also becoming much more expensive, as is the cost of shelter.<\/em><\/strong>&nbsp; And the flattening in medical costs may be\ncoming to an end.&nbsp; So, <strong><em>while\nconsumer inflation is not accelerating significantly, there seem to be\nunderlying trends that indicate we could see the rate rise as we go forward.<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong><em>The tight labor market continues to push up wages,\nwhich rose sharply in December<\/em><\/strong>.&nbsp; They jumped\nby over 3% from the December 2017 level.&nbsp;\n<strong><em>With overall consumer costs declining, inflation-adjusted (real)\nearnings improved quite solidly.&nbsp; Over\nthe year, they broke back over the 1% level for the first time in over two\nyears. <\/em><\/strong>&nbsp;Since energy prices are\nrebounding, that may not hold.&nbsp; Still,\nwhen spending power is rising by only 1% and with the savings rate trending\ndownward, it is hard to see how spending can hold up.&nbsp; <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>MARKETS AND\nFED POLICY IMPLICATIONS:<\/strong> &nbsp;<strong><em>Chairman\nPowell baffles me.<\/em><\/strong>&nbsp; He talks\nabout the economy as if it is in good shape, but then indicates that continuing\nthe rate normalization process may or may not continue.&nbsp; <strong><em>Growth is still good and inflation is at or\nabove the Fed\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s target.&nbsp; So, what is his\nproblem? <\/em><\/strong>&nbsp;You can say that the\nsharp drop in the equity markets is a sign of impending doom, or you can argue\nas I have that the decline simply corrects for some irrational exuberance.&nbsp; <strong><em>If the markets are signaling a recession\nahead, then slowing or ending the normalization process makes sense.&nbsp; If the volatility was more emotional as well\nas a normal correction from excessively optimistic expectations, then it\ndoesn\u00e2\u20ac\u2122t make sense to slow the rate hikes.<\/em><\/strong>&nbsp; Since the Fed\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s own estimates are for at\nabout 2.3% growth this year, which is above the members\u00e2\u20ac\u2122 estimate of trend\ngrowth, what is the problem?&nbsp; As I said,\nI just don\u00e2\u20ac\u2122t get it.&nbsp; <strong><em>The next\nFOMC meeting where a hike might occur is not until March 19-20.&nbsp;&nbsp; Unless the government shut down and the\ntrade war seriously harm growth, I don\u00e2\u20ac\u2122t see why an increase shouldn\u00e2\u20ac\u2122t happen\nat that meeting, if the Fed really is basing its decisions on economic data.<\/em><\/strong>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>KEY DATA: CPI: -0.1%; Excluding Energy: +0.2%; Gasoline: -7.4%\/ Inflation-Adjusted Hourly Earnings: +0.5%; Over Year: 1.1% IN A NUTSHELL: &nbsp;\u00e2\u20ac\u0153Inflation continues at a pace that should make the Fed happy, but accelerating wage gains remain a threat.\u00e2\u20ac\u009d WHAT IT MEANS: &nbsp;While parts of the government\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s data mill are shut down, the Bureau of Labor Statistics &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/naroffeconomics.com\/?p=1436\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">December Consumer Prices and Real Earnings<\/span> <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[3],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1436","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-economic-indicators"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/naroffeconomics.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1436","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/naroffeconomics.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/naroffeconomics.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/naroffeconomics.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/naroffeconomics.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=1436"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/naroffeconomics.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1436\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1437,"href":"https:\/\/naroffeconomics.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1436\/revisions\/1437"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/naroffeconomics.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=1436"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/naroffeconomics.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=1436"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/naroffeconomics.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=1436"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}